摘要翻译：
我们研究了新冠肺炎疫情导致的封锁对女性和男性学者社会科学研究生产率的不成比例的影响。封锁对学术活动造成了严重干扰，要求人们在家工作。这种混乱如何影响生产力和相关的两性平等，是一个重要的业务和社会问题。我们从社会科学最大的开放存取预印本储存库中收集数据，涉及25个国家的76,832名作者在两年的时间里制作的18个学科的41,858份研究预印本。我们使用差异中的差异方法，利用外源性流行病冲击。我们的结果表明，在美国封锁后的10周内，尽管总研究生产率提高了35%，但女性学者的生产率相对于男性学者下降了13.9%。我们还表明，几个学科驱动了这种性别不平等。最后，我们发现这种加剧的生产率差距在排名靠前的大学中更为明显，并且在其他六个国家也存在这种影响。我们的工作指出了封锁导致的生产率公平问题，这一发现在大学评估教师生产率时会有所帮助。它还帮助组织意识到远程办公可能产生的潜在意外后果。
---
英文标题：
《Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic》
---
作者：
Ruomeng Cui (1), Hao Ding (1), Feng Zhu (2) ((1) Goizueta Business
  School, Emory University, (2) Harvard Business School, Harvard University)
---
最新提交年份：
2021
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Computer Science        计算机科学
二级分类：Digital Libraries        数字图书馆
分类描述：Covers all aspects of the digital library design and document and text creation. Note that there will be some overlap with Information Retrieval (which is a separate subject area). Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Classes H.3.5, H.3.6, H.3.7, I.7.
涵盖了数字图书馆设计和文献及文本创作的各个方面。注意，与信息检索（这是一个单独的主题领域）会有一些重叠。大致包括ACM课程H.3.5、H.3.6、H.3.7、I.7中的材料。
--
一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  We study the disproportionate impact of the lockdown as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak on female and male academics' research productivity in social science. The lockdown has caused substantial disruptions to academic activities, requiring people to work from home. How this disruption affects productivity and the related gender equity is an important operations and societal question. We collect data from the largest open-access preprint repository for social science on 41,858 research preprints in 18 disciplines produced by 76,832 authors across 25 countries over a span of two years. We use a difference-in-differences approach leveraging the exogenous pandemic shock. Our results indicate that, in the 10 weeks after the lockdown in the United States, although the total research productivity increased by 35%, female academics' productivity dropped by 13.9% relative to that of male academics. We also show that several disciplines drive such gender inequality. Finally, we find that this intensified productivity gap is more pronounced for academics in top-ranked universities, and the effect exists in six other countries. Our work points out the fairness issue in productivity caused by the lockdown, a finding that universities will find helpful when evaluating faculty productivity. It also helps organizations realize the potential unintended consequences that can arise from telecommuting.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.10194