英文文献：Recovery of Residential Premises through Adoption of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Techniques: Experience from Lagos, Nigeria-通过采用替代性纠纷解决(ADR)技术收回住宅用地:来自尼日利亚拉各斯的经验
英文文献作者：D. T. Olapade,B. Olapade,B. T. Aluko
英文文献摘要：
One of the remedies of breach of covenant(s) in landlord tenancy relationship is recovery of premises. This is apart from reasons of personal use and/or the need for comprehensive renovation/adaptation/conversion. Whereas it is easy as said or as may be engrossed in the Agreement to recover possession in case of breach of covenants(s), it is not so easy in practical term. The usual approach of achieving this in practice is through recourse to litigation which is expensive, time consuming and also result into loss of income to the property. This paper aim at exploring the use of ADR techniques as a legitimate means of ejection of recalcitrant tenant in property without the use of “power of threat”. This is with a view of providing information that will improve property investment and management. The paper adopt a case study approach using five selected case studies where ADR approach were employed to recover premises. The experience from the case studies shows that the use of ADR in premises recovery is effective but also has its challenges. In the five case studies, consent judgment, mediation, arbitration and negotiation that often includes persuasion and inducement were employed to recover premises in less than three months compared to an average of eighteen months using litigation. Also, the cost in all the cases are lower where they exist at all than when litigation that ends with FIFE and the incidental expenses thereof are employed. The paper provides challenges and useful information to practitioners on the use of effective alternative approach to recover premises from recalcitrant tenants.

若业主违反租约关系，其中一项补救措施是收回物业。这并不是出于个人用途和/或需要进行全面翻新/改造/改造的原因。虽然在违反契约的情况下收回占有权如上文所述或协议中所述是容易的，但实际上却并非如此。在实践中实现这一点的通常方法是诉诸诉讼，这是昂贵的、费时的，而且还会造成财产收入的损失。本文旨在探讨如何在不使用“威胁力量”的情况下，将ADR技术作为驱逐抗拒承租人的合法手段。这是为了提供有助于改善房地产投资和管理的信息。本文采用案例研究的方法，选取了五个案例进行研究，其中ADR方法用于恢复场地。案例研究的经验表明，在房屋回收中使用不良反应是有效的，但也有其挑战。在这五个个案研究中，使用同意判断、调解、仲裁和谈判(通常包括说服和诱导)在不到三个月的时间内收回楼宇，而使用诉讼平均需要十八个月。而且，在所有的案件中，其成本在存在的情况下都比以法夫和附带费用结束的诉讼要低。本论文就如何有效地从顽固租户手中收回房屋，向从业人员提供了挑战和有用的信息。