昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读342小时。

昨日阅读2小时，累积阅读652小时。

昨日阅读0.5小时，共计7小时

上了一天课，还是抓紧时间读了一会。再接再厉！

昨日2小时，累计730小时

昨天阅读1小时，累计阅读6小时

昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读195小时。

昨天阅读时间2小时，累计阅读时间26小时

昨日阅读5小时，累计阅读127小时

昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读381小时

昨日阅读：
1、书名：《钱，七步创造终身收入》82%；
2、讲了什么：七步之中第一步是多存钱，第二步是少上当，第三步是做规划，第四步是定配置，第五步是稳收入；通过前三步你有了储蓄、了解了市场的游戏规则，并且知道了自己的目标数字是多大，之后就是向着你的目标前进的时候了，投资前进的道路有三条：选股、择时、资产配置，这三条路径资产配置占有绝对优势，因为经济的气候来来去去，不同气候下各类资产的表现不同，因此风险敞口和收益表现也不同，资产配置的目标是在你能承受的风险之下最大化收益，减少投资组合的波动性，因为人类往往会高估自己对损失的承受能力。资产配置即是指把你的资金分散到不同的资产类别上，买很多只股票并不叫资产配置，因为你的资产都在股票上，资产配置是指你的资金分散在股票、债券、商品/黄金、REITs等产品上，打造你自己的资产配置组合，作者推荐了在采访达利欧时达利欧透露的全季节投资组合--桥水基金全天候投资组合的简化版，达利欧的这个配置的思想是建立在经济会有经济上行、下行，通胀高于预期、低于预期四个季节的基础上，因此面对经济的四季，资产组合中的风险应该均衡，具体地--股票占30%、中期国债15%、长期国债40%、商品7.5%、黄金7.5%；作者的团队作了回测得到了非常好的结果；第五步稳收入，即是利用一种古老的产品--保险公司的年金来实现，现在在西方国家有很多新类型的年金出现，主要分为两大类：即时年金和延期年金；千万不要买入可变年金，他们投入公募基金，却不给固定收入，你要同时承担公募基金和保险公司的两种费用。
3、思考感想：达利欧全天候投资组合在美国将近100年的市场回测表现极其良好，最大回撤-3.93%，平均年化收益9.27%（扣除费用），我想有时间可以用这个组合对中国市场进行一个回测，想来结果不会差；稳收入的年金在我国不知道是什么情况，可以研究一下。
4、阅读时间：7小时；
5、累计阅读时间：211小时。

昨天阅读3小时，累计阅读171小时。
48 Laws of Power部分摘要:

Law 9 Win Through Your Actions, Never Through Argument
Judgment: Any momentary triumph you think you have gained through argument is really a Pyrrhic victory: The resentment and ill will you stir up is stronger and lasts longer than any momentary change of opinion. It is much more powerful to get others to agree with you through your actions, without saying a word. Demonstrate, do not explicate.
The Arguer does not understand that words are never neutral, and that by arguing with a superior he impugns the intelligence of one more powerful than he. He also has no awareness of the person he is dealing with. Since each man believes that he is right, and words will rarely convince him otherwise, the arguer’s reasoning falls on deaf ears. When cornered, he only argues more, digging his own grave. Once he has made the other person feel insecure and inferior in his beliefs, the eloquence of Socrates could not save the situation.
It is not simply a question of avoiding an argument with those who stand above you. We all believe we are masters in the realm of opinions and reasoning. You must be careful, then: Learn to demonstrate the correctness of your ideas indirectly.
In the realm of power you must learn to judge your moves by their long term effects on other people. The problem in trying to prove a point or gain a victory through argument is that in the end you can never be certain how it affects the people you’re arguing with: They may appear to agree with you politely, but iside they may resent you. Or perhaps something you said inadvertently even offended them—words have that insidious ability to be interpreted according to the other person’s mood and insecurities. Even the best argument has no solid foundation, for we have all come to distrust the slippery nature of words. And days after agreeing with someone, we often revert to our old opinion out of sheer habit.
Understand this: Words are a dime a dozen. Everyone knows that in the heat of an argument, we will all say anything to support our cause. Who can be persuaded by bags of air like that? Action and demonstration are much more powerful and meaningful. They are there, before our eyes, for us to see. “The truth is generally seen, rarely heard.”
The power of demonstrating your idea is that your opponents do not get defensive, and are therefore more open to persuasion. Making them literally and physically feel your meaning is infinitely more powerful than argument.
When aiming for power, or trying to conserve it, always look for the indirect route. And also choose your battles carefully. If it does not matter in the long run whether the other person agrees with you—or if time and their own experience will make them understand what you mean—then it is best not even to bother with a demonstration. Save your energy and walk away.
Imagine: The Seesaw. Up and down and up and down go the arguers, getting nowhere fast. Get off the seesaw and show them your meaning without kicking or pushing. Leave them at the top and let gravity bring then gently to the ground.
Authority: ” Never argue. In society nothing must be discussed; give only results.”
Verbal argument has one vital use in the realm of power: To distract and cover your tracks when you are practicing deception or are caught in a lie.

昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读280小时

昨日阅读0.5小时，累计阅读200小时

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读44小时。<br>
只是无论商业模式多么令人眼花缭乱，道理永远很简单：“物美”和“价廉”只能二选一；节省营销费用必然会导致虚假宣传。

和‘已逝的伟人’交朋友，这听起来很好玩，但如果你确实在生活中与那些有 杰出思想的已逝的伟人成为朋友，那么我认为你会过上更好的生活，得到更好的教育。这种方法比简单地给出一些基本概念好得多。——穷查理宝典
昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读11小时，阅读快思慢想、穷查理宝典

2018-09-19

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读401小时                          

Read book "Making Things Happy -- Mastering Project Management" by Scott Berkun

The book offers a collection of essays on field-tested philosophies and strategies for defining, leading, and managing projects. Each essay distills complex concepts and challenges into practical nuggets of useful advice, and the new edition now adds more value for leaders and managers of projects everywhere. Based on nine years of experience as a program manager for Internet Explorer and lead program manager for Windows and MSN, Berkun explains to technical and non-technical readers alike what it takes to get through a large software or web development project. Making Things Happen doesn't cite specific methods, but focuses on philosophy and strategy. Unlike other project management books, Berkun offers personal essays in a comfortable style and easy tone that emulate the relationship of a wise project manager who gives good, entertaining and passionate advice to those who ask. Topics in this new edition include:
    How to make things happen
    Making good decisions
    Specifications and requirements
    Ideas and what to do with them
    How not to annoy people
    Leadership and trust
    The truth about making dates
    What to do when things go wrong

Complete with a new forward from the author and a discussion guide for forming reading groups/teams, Making Things Happen offers in-depth exercises to help you apply lessons from the book to your job. It is inspiring, funny, honest, and compelling, and definitely the one book that you and your team need to have within arm's reach throughout the life of your project. Coming from the rare perspective of someone who fought difficult battles on Microsoft'sbiggest projects and taught project design and management for MSTE, Microsoft's internal best practices group, this is valuable advice indeed. It will serve you well with your current work, and on future projects to come.

昨日阅读3小时，累计阅读46小时，学习CFA一级 经济学部分

昨日阅读《三体》5小时，累计阅读12.5小时

昨天阅读2小时，累计阅读131小时 18

昨日阅读6小时，总计阅读13.5小时。加油！

昨日阅读1小时累计阅读20小时
阅读推荐：量化以python为工具
这本书在论坛里可以下载
这本书非常实用，分为三部分：1,.python 的讲解，主要涉及函数，package pandas 的理解与应用，通俗易懂。旨在交流python的语法结构
2. 统计学基础，在python基础上，对于量化的统计学基础进行了简明的叙述！
3. 金融学基础，大致介绍了量化金融的各个方向！
非常值得一读
python是3，不像很多书，还停留在python2

<div align=\"left\"  >阅读1小时，总计625小时，第589日。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >阅读《思想的力量》至55%<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >每件事时所追求的那个东西。它在医术中是健康，在战术中是胜利，在建筑术中是一所房屋，在其他技艺中是某种其他东西，在每种活动和选择中就是那个目的，其他的一切都是为着它而做的。所以，如果我们所有的活动都只有一个目的，这些目的就是可实行的善。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >要习惯于相信死亡与我们无关，因为一切好与坏都在感觉之中，而死亡是感觉的剥夺。只要正确认识到死亡与我们无关，我们就能甚至享受生命的有死性一面——这不是依靠给自己添加无穷的时间，而是依靠消除对于永生不死的渴望。对于彻底地、真正地理解了生命的结束并不是什么坏事的人，在他活着的时候也不惧怕……所有坏事中最大的那个——死亡——与我们毫不相干，因为当我们活着的时候，死亡还没有来临；当死亡来临的时候，我们已经不在了。所以死亡既与活着的人无关，又与死去的人无关；因为对于生者，死还不存在；至于死者，他们本身已经不存在了……<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >正是因为快乐是首要的好和天生的好，我们不选择所有的快乐，反而放弃许许多多的快乐，如果这些快乐会带来更多的痛苦的话。而且，我们认为有许多痛苦比快乐要好，尤其是当这些痛苦持续了长时间后带来更大快乐的时候。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >困扰人的不是事物本身，而是人对于它们的判断。比如说，死亡根本不可怕——否则即使苏格拉底也会恐惧死亡——可怕的是“死亡可怕”这样的判断。因此，当我们遇到艰难险阻、感到困扰或沮丧的时候，我们不该抱怨别人，而应当反省自己，也就是说，反省自己的判断。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >若是把我的准则变成一条普遍原则，事情会怎样呢？从这里我们可以看到，这一准则永远也不会被当成普遍的自然规律，而不必然陷于自相矛盾。因为，如果一个人认为自己在困难的时候，可以把随便做不负责任的诺言变成一条普遍规律，那就会使人们所有的一切诺言和保证成为不可能，人们再也不会相信他所做的保证，而把所有这样的表白看成欺人之谈而作为笑柄。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >我必须再次说明这一点：那些攻击功利主义的人们很少正确地认识到，构成功利主义行为标准的那个快乐不是当事人自身的快乐，而是所有人快乐的总合。对于自身的快乐和他人的快乐，功利主义要求一个人做到严格的公正，仿佛就像一位超然物外的、仁慈的旁观者。在拿撒勒的耶稣所说的黄金箴言那里，我们就能读到功利主义伦理学的全部灵魂：“你想要别人如何待你，你就如何待别人”，还有“像爱你自己一样爱你的邻人”，它们尽善尽美地描绘了功利主义道德的理念。<br>

</div><br>

<div align=\"left\"  >一般说来，政治哲学（political

昨日阅读0.5小时，累计阅读121.5小时

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读19小时

昨日读0.5小时   累计96小时

今天读了3小时，累计350小时

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读682小时

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读375小时。

昨日阅读1.5小时，累计阅读23小时，学习帖子你读懂了《资本论》吗，了解帖子中国经济领域顶级阵容出席，周日这场会议都说了些什么，自勉。

宏观纪要
https://xueqiu.com/1091470878/113979365