lz不必生气.老教授说的是自己的观点,本身没有什么错.只不过很多人都是一叶障目不见泰山.不会系统全面的分析问题.这也没有办法.我们就是这样被教育的.

可以想想有几个老师曾经对一个问题进行过跨学科、多角度的分析

1. 工资上涨率在不超过劳动生产率增长率的情况下，并不会导致国内通货膨胀。

2. 在劳动力市场不存在扭曲的情况下，工资变动应当是市场自发行为，不要与政府涨公务员工资等同起来。

3. 从理论上讲，为解决当前的国际收支不平衡，或者人民币升值、或者给贸易部门涨工资，我认为后者更有利于国内产业和普通百姓。原因有二：（1）汇率上涨具有普遍杀伤力，会殃及原本并不具备优势的贸易部门；（2）涨工资比人民币升值使工人的实际收入有更显著的提高，因为目前普通百姓出国旅游或者消费进口品的比例并不高。

if the Chinese currency appreciate, the most significant point would be on the international trade, because in china, most foreign trade use USD, when Chinese yuen/usd increases, domestic producers receive less usd, they suffered, however, they may transfer the pressure to reduce the quality, price of input, so reduce the wage rate could be one of their solutions, in that case, the labor will get less paid. In china, there is not minimum wage regulation, so the final result of currency appreciation will transfer to labor market and other input market. set a minimum wage rate could be a solution to solve the problem.

On the other hand, the foreign company will seek for other cheaper labor market, if this happen, the GDP will fall dramatically, there is a dilemma.

My opinion is the American uses Chinese currency to solve the unbalance in their international trade and one example is the Japanese yen in last century.