各位老师,各位同学,我在做门槛效应检验时,单门限、双门限都显著,最后的回归结果中各个变量系数也显著,但在将门槛回归结果与固定效应回归结果比较时,发现门槛回归的系数和固定效应回归的系数有较大差异,我应该如何解读这一结果?是不是说明门槛回归模型不稳健?求解!
这是门槛回归的结果
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pcdi | Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
lngdp | 7204.136 695.4387 10.36 0.000 5829.043 8579.23
ple | 7.092225 11.13167 0.64 0.525 -14.91847 29.10292
er | -23.88207 10.44832 -2.29 0.024 -44.54158 -3.222571
|
_cat#c.fi |
0 | 33.86658 4.353101 7.78 0.000 25.25918 42.47399
1 | 42.89857 4.876381 8.80 0.000 33.25648 52.54065
2 | 49.60186 5.021921 9.88 0.000 39.672 59.53172
|
_cons | -62055.3 6852.19 -9.06 0.000 -75604.16 -48506.44
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 2097.9874
sigma_e | 480.56896
rho | .95014643 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F test that all u_i=0: F(23, 138) = 27.81 Prob > F = 0.0000
这是固定效应的结果
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
pcdi | Coefficient std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
fi | 16.59864 4.38478 3.79 0.001 7.528032 25.66925
lngdp | 11450.95 721.2304 15.88 0.000 9958.969 12942.93
ple | 37.51494 16.63995 2.25 0.034 3.092594 71.9373
er | -40.6727 8.978883 -4.53 0.000 -59.24694 -22.09847
_cons | -103013 7183.68 -14.34 0.000 -117873.5 -88152.38
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 3173.1651
sigma_e | 657.72415
rho | .95880609 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
可以看到,门槛回归模型中fi的系数是30多、40多,而固定效应模型中fi的系数是16.6;其他变量的系数也都相差很远