CSOs-SSOs-Final-Release-Version-effective-01-01-2011.pdf (255.71 KB) A. Permitted if the change will result in a more reliable and more relevant presentation of the financial statements.2. Under IFRS, an entity that acquires an intangible asset may use the revaluation model for subsequent measurement only if
B. Permitted if the entity encounters new transactions, events, or conditions that are substantively different from existing or previous transactions.
C. Required on material transactions, if the entity had previously accounted for similar, though immaterial, transactions under an unacceptable accounting method.
D. Required if an alternate accounting policy gives rise to a material change in assets, liabilities, or the current-year net income.
A. The useful life of the intangible asset can be reliably determined.3. Under IFRS, which of the following is a criterion that must be met in order for an item to be recognized as an intangible asset other than goodwill?
B. An active market exists for the intangible asset.
C. The cost of the intangible asset can be measured reliably.
D. The intangible asset is a monetary asset.
A. The item’s fair value can be measured reliably.
B. The item is part of the entity’s activities aimed at gaining new scientific or technical knowledge.
C. The item is expected to be used in the production or supply of goods or services.
D. The item is identifiable and lacks physical substance.
| One-time trademark purchase price | $100,000 |
| One-time trademark purchase price | 5,000 |
| Nonrefundable VAT taxes | 7,000 |
| Training sales personnel on the use of the new trademark | 24,000 |
| Research expenditures associated with the purchase of the new trademark | 10,500 |
| Salaries of the administrative personnel | 12,000 |
A. $100,0005. Under IFRS, when an entity chooses the revaluation model as its accounting policy for measuring property, plant and equipment, which of the following statements is correct?
B. $115,500
C. $146,500
D. $158,500
A. When an asset is revalued, the entire class of property, plant and equipment to which that asset belongs must be revalued.6. Upon first-time adoption of IFRS, an entity may elect to use fair value as deemed cost for
B. When an asset is revalued, individual assets within a class of property, plant and equipment to which that asset belongs can be revalued.
C. Revaluations of property, plant and equipment must be made at least every three years.
D. Increases in an asset’s carrying value as a result of the first revaluation must be recognized as a component of profit or loss.
A. Biological assets related to agricultural activity for which there is no active market.
B. Intangible assets for which there is no active market.
C. Any individual item of property, plant and equipment.
D. Financial liabilities that are not held for trading.
A. $10,000
B. $10,800
C. $12,000
D. $13,200
9. On July 1, year 2, a company decided to adopt IFRS. The company’s first IFRS reporting period is as of and for the year ended December 31, year 2. The company will present one year of comparative information. What is the company’s date of transition to IFRS?
A. January 1, year 1.
B. January 1, year 2.
C. July 1, year 2.
D. December 31, year 2.
10. A company determined the following values for its inventory as of the end of its fiscal year:
Under IFRS, what amount should the company report as inventory on its balance sheet?
Historical cost $100,000
Current replacement cost 70,000
Net realizable value 90,000
Net realizable value less a normal profit margin 85,000
Fair value 95,000
A. $70,000答案:
B. $85,000
C. $90,000
D. $95,000
| 1.Executive Summary The purpose of this paper is to provide some brief background about International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)and discuss the potential impact to an organization's financial systems when completing an IFRS conversion project.The information provided assumes the reader has some general background information about IFRS.The following information will be discussed throughout this paper: ·Background of IFRS and Information Technology(IT)impact when converting to IFRS ·Key differences between IFRS and U.S.GAAP and the impact to financial/business reporting ·Implementation considerations ·Learning from the European experience ·Case study example:IFRS transition in Canada |
| Background of IFRS&IT Impact Today,more than 100 countries require/permit the use of International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS),or are converging with the IASB's standards.On February 24,2010,SEC Chairman Mary L.Schapiro released a public statement regarding IFRS convergence between International Accounting Standards Board(IASB)and Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB):"For nearly 30 years,the Commission has promoted a single set of high-quality globally accepted accounting standards,which would advance the dual goals of improving financial reporting within the U.S.and reducing country-by-country disparities in financial reporting,but supporting this goal is only the beginning of the discussion,not the end." In the AICPA IFRS Preparedness Survey conducted in September 2009,a 54% majority of CPAs believed that the SEC should ultimately require adoption of IFRS for U.S.public companies.Furthermore,over 50% of respondents expressed a need to know some level of IFRS over the next three years.However,with these uncertainties surrounding U.S.CPAs and SEC's decision to mandate IFRS for U.S.public companies,some organizations question,why convert to IFRS? ·Considerations for filing of IFRS financial statements include: ·Multinational companies may benefit from the use of common financial reporting systems ·IFRS may ease financial statement comparability with other companies that use IFRS ·IFRS is intended to facilitate cross-border investments and access to global capital markets Other key benefits include opportunities to improve/streamline business functions and processes,globally integrate the financial IT systems,and achieve consolidation/reporting efficiency.On the other hand,there are risks associated when a company decides to convert to IFRS.Some of these risks are excessive resource spending,improper data management or migration,incomplete revisions of policies and procedures,future changes that standard setters may issue,and more. While there are many benefits and risks to converting to IFRS,a few key factors should be taken into consideration prior to implementation or during project planning.Although the IASB and FASB are working toward convergence,there are currently many differences between the two sets of standards(see Key Differences between IFRS and GAAP below).It will be important to monitor the changes as the two boards complete their joint work plan as outlined in their Memorandum of Understanding.Furthermore,companies should first assess which principles/standards will impact their organizations directly,conduct some research,and have a strong understanding prior to implementation.A detailed discussion regarding project planning is further explored under Implementation Considerations. Potential System Impacts of an IFRS Conversion As a company prepares to convert to IFRS,the impact to information technology(IT)and financial systems should be taken into consideration during the planning phase.Representatives from the company's IT department should be involved throughout the planning process to evaluate how the proposed accounting changes will impact the financial systems(transactional or reporting). The impact to IT and financial systems can vary depending on a company's existing structure and environment.This may include its IT and financial systems capability/integration,industry complexity,company size,relevance of business process/transaction,internal control structure,mergers&acquisitions process,and other attributes. If a company's IT and financial systems are substantially integrated globally,then the degree of impact or modifications may be of lesser extent.The extent of changes may be primarily some sub-ledger configuration changes and more extensively in the general ledger and consolidation system.However,if a company has frequently acquired entities(each with unique financial systems)and has not yet integrated the acquired company systems within the organization's infrastructure,then the degree of system impact may be quite large at the sub-ledger level as well as the internal reporting level. The extent of changes may also vary depending on the consolidation method that management chooses.Consolidations may be implemented at the corporate-level or at each individual country/entity.However,companies that implement at the corporate level may potentially run the risk of error and potentially re-stating its financial statements as well as other situations if the numerous journal entry adjustments are not tracked or controlled properly.Furthermore,if a dual reporting system is in place during the transition period,the reconciliation process needs to be taken into consideration.Reconciling between two different"views"of the financial statements poses different problems than singularly supporting of one or the other.Therefore,having an effective reconciliation reporting system is an important aspect to the learning curve of the IFRS transition. While system changes will have costs associated with them,some companies or the management team may view the IFRS conversion project as an opportunity to re-assess and improve the internal business processes.It will be up to the organization to determine which path to choose,and the outcome associated with the path.Below is a chart that highlights some of the impact to IT and financial systems. If the company is ready to convert to IFRS,it's important to ensure that the company has good change management policies and procedures in place.Having strong policies and procedures will be beneficial if further system revisions are required and traceable for internal control purposes.Refer to Implementation Considerations below for more details about impact to Internal Controls. Exhibit 1 Potential System Impacts During IFRS Implementation ![]() |
| Key differences between IFRS and GAAP & impact to financial/ business reporting Transaction Differences There are a number of differences between U.S.GAAP and IFRS.Below is a chart that highlights a few of these differences. In addition to these transaction examples listed below,IASB and FASB are also working jointly on several MoU projects targeted for completion in 2010 and 2011.Major convergence projects include: ·Revenue Recognition ·Leases ·Financial Instruments ·Consolidations ·De-recognition ·Fair Value Measurement ·Financial Statement Presentation ·Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity As these major MoU projects are completed and new standards are released by the FASB,these changes will impact how the transactions are recorded,processed and/ or reported within a financial system(most likely prior to converting to IFRS depending on the time of completion). It is important to monitor both the FASB and IASB website for project updates on when the standards are under exposure draft(review)and ready for release(final). Certain IFRS/GAAP differences may likely be adjusted through General Ledger journal entries or chart of account structuring and do not require system changes at the sub-ledger level.The approach will vary depending on the organization's structure and environment described above in Potential System Impacts of an IFRS Conversion.However,opportunities for automation using Excel macros and formulas or other alternative tools may be possible for separate journal posting calculations.Additionally,this list of examples will continue to change as the FASB and IASB continue their efforts to converge standards. Exhibit 2 Transaction Differences ![]() Impact to Financial or Business Reporting Besides specific transactional differences,converting from U.S.GAAP to IFRS will also impact a company's external and internal reporting requirements.Although some transactional differences require only journal entry adjustments within the General Ledger(or minimal financial system changes),other changes may impact an organization’s current reporting infrastructure(such as data warehousing environment or associated reporting program).Furthermore,journal entry adjustments for multiple countries and parallel reporting in IFRS and GAAP may become cumbersome without additional tools to assist in the reporting process(such as a consolidation tool).Below is a chart that highlights some of these external and internal reporting examples. Similar to the transaction differences,it is important to monitor both the FASB and IASB websites for MoUrelated project updates since several of these projects also relate to the financial reporting requirements listed above.In addition,the challenge to implementing these transactional or reporting changes is that organizations will still have to consider dual reporting once the entity decides to convert to IFRS.Companies will have to either(1)maintain both processes for statutory reporting until the three-year requirement is complete or(2)maintain one process and make topside adjustments to the other statutory reporting requirement.While both alternatives are achievable,option 2 can become cumbersome,difficult to track and not ideal/feasible.Explanation of the dual-reporting timeline is further discussed under Implementation Considerations. Exhibit 3 External and Internal Reporting Differences ![]() The AICPA's IFRS Primer for Audit Committees addressed two relevant IT-related questions that management should consider during the implementation process: ·How will this affect the company's way of doing business(e.g.changes to IT and other internal systems;risk monitoring and controls;inventory accounting;budgeting and forecasting;key performance indicators;joint ventures and alliances;subsidiaries;etc.)? ·How is management making system changes or implementing new systems today,in recognition of possible changes in the future? As the above examples point out,transactional and reporting differences between IFRS and U.S.GAAP do affect a company's way of doing business.This leads to implementation issues to consider as a company decides to convert to IFRS. |
| AICPA 考试资格评估需提供的文件: 1. 学位证书 ――中文复印件(加盖学校红章)、英文翻译原件 2. 毕业证书 ――中文复印件(加盖学校红章)、英文翻译原件 3. 学生成绩单 ――中文复印件(加盖学校红章)、英文翻译原件 4. TOEFL、GMAT、GRE 成绩单 ――不是必须提供 5. 曾经参加的其它国际会计资格考试证书或成绩单 ――不是必须提供 例如:ACCA CIA CGA CIMA AIA 澳洲CPA等 6. 身份证复印件,个人中英文简历 7. 近期免冠两张2x2寸的彩色照片 8. FACS – Foreign Academic Credentials Service Evaluation Form |
扫码加好友,拉您进群



收藏
