摘要翻译：
本文试图为Hollingworth和Mueller(2008)提出的“用新的认识论改造社会经济学”这一命题提供佐证和平衡。首先，我回顾了我自己科学道路上的一个个人亮点，它说明了跨学科的力量以及自然和社会过程数学描述的统一性。我还反对这样一种说法，即复杂系统一般`不受数学分析的影响，但必须通过让它们随时间演化或通过模拟分析来理解它们‘。此外，我还提出证据，证明在《科学II》中工作的科学家不会对未来做出预测，因为它太复杂了。我强调第三个量子科学及其相关概念和哲学革命的潜力，最后指出网络新理论的一些局限性。
---
英文标题：
《Interdisciplinarity in Socio-economics, mathematical analysis and
  predictability of complex systems》
---
作者：
D. Sornette (ETH Zurich)
---
最新提交年份：
2008
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Physics        物理学
二级分类：Physics and Society        物理学与社会
分类描述：Structure, dynamics and collective behavior of societies and groups (human or otherwise). Quantitative analysis of social networks and other complex networks. Physics and engineering of infrastructure and systems of broad societal impact (e.g., energy grids, transportation networks).
社会和团体（人类或其他）的结构、动态和集体行为。社会网络和其他复杂网络的定量分析。具有广泛社会影响的基础设施和系统（如能源网、运输网络）的物理和工程。
--
一级分类：Physics        物理学
二级分类：Physics Education        物理教育
分类描述：Report of results of a research study, laboratory experience, assessment or classroom practice that represents a way to improve teaching and learning in physics. Also, report on misconceptions of students, textbook errors, and other similar information relative to promoting physics understanding.
一项研究、实验室经验、评估或课堂实践的结果报告，它代表了一种改进物理教与学的方法。此外，报告学生的误解，教科书错误，以及其他与促进物理理解有关的类似信息。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：General Finance        一般财务
分类描述：Development of general quantitative methodologies with applications in finance
通用定量方法的发展及其在金融中的应用
--

---
英文摘要：
  In this essay, I attempt to provide supporting evidence as well as some balance for the thesis on `Transforming socio-economics with a new epistemology' presented by Hollingworth and Mueller (2008). First, I review a personal highlight of my own scientific path that illustrates the power of interdisciplinarity as well as unity of the mathematical description of natural and social processes. I also argue against the claim that complex systems are in general `not susceptible to mathematical analysis, but must be understood by letting them evolve over time or with simulation analysis'. Moreover, I present evidence of the limits of the claim that scientists working within Science II do not make predictions about the future because it is too complex. I stress the potentials for a third `Quantum Science' and its associated conceptual and philosophical revolutions, and finally point out some limits of the `new' theory of networks.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0807.3814