全部版块 我的主页
论坛 数据科学与人工智能 数据分析与数据科学 SAS专版
2110 1
2011-08-02
请教各位前辈,小弟现在用GLIMMIX考察多个因素对因变量的影响,但是算出来的结果在“Tests of Fixed Effects”是有显著差异的,而在Solutions for Fixed Effects中的test的却没有显著差异,请问这是怎么回事,到底该相信哪个结果?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2011-8-2 11:42:15
SOLUTION | S
requests that a solution for the fixed-effects parameters be produced. Using notation
from the “Notation for the Generalized Linear Mixed Model” section beginning on
page 7, the fixed-effects parameter estimates areb , and their (approximate) estimated
standard errors are the square roots of the diagonal elements of cvar[b ]. This matrix
commonly is of the form (X0bV−1X)− in GLMMs. You can output this approximate
variance matrix with the COVB option. See the section “Details” on page 108 section
on the construction of bV in the various models.
Along with the estimates and their approximate standard errors, a t statistic is
computed as the estimate divided by its standard error. The degrees of freedom
for this t statistic matches the one appearing in the “Tests of Fixed Effects” table
under the effect containing the parameter. If DDFM=KENWARDROGER or
DDFM=SATTERTH, the degrees of freedom are computed separately for each
fixed-effect estimate, unless you override the value for any specific effect with the
DDF=value-list option. The “Pr > |t|” column contains the two-tailed p-value corresponding
to the t statistic and associated degrees of freedom. You can use the CL
option to request confidence intervals for the fixed-effects parameters; they are constructed
around the estimate by using a radius of the standard error times a percentage
point from the t distribution.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群