姚洋分析的很对。不喜欢凯瑞布朗的说法。成为全球强权不是那么容易的，也不是拯救欧债就能达到的。再者对于一个内部矛盾重重地国家来说，即使整体够强权又如何？还记得前段时间鼓吹全球经济第二来么，平均下来，不还是比人家差远了吗。 国内真正的和谐才是重点，是不是全球强权无所谓。不要再被外国人忽悠了。

姚洋分析的很对。不喜欢凯瑞布朗的说法。成为全球强权不是那么容易的，也不是拯救欧债就能达到的。再者对于一个内部矛盾重重地国家来说，即使整体够强权又如何？还记得前段时间鼓吹全球经济第二来么，平均下来，不还是比人家差远了吗。 国内真正的和谐才是重点，是不是全球强权无所谓。不要再被外国人忽悠了。

    After reading the passage, I've drawed a conclusion whether China give a hand to Euro-region depends on themselves,not our country. What we gain is not equal to what we lose. They don't treat fairly to the foreign investment enterprise of our country. What's more, with the advent of deadline 2016, western countries haven't recognized the market economy status of China yet.  And thinking about the financial crisis, it's just a common program of economy cycle in capitalist society . Of course, it does cause great turmoil with  S & P cutting down some countries' sovereign credit rating.
    we are not bound to be a helper when every financial crisis breaks down. it's not for a good so-called imaginary reputation, for real benefit to every Chinese people. In another hand, our government has much to do with domestic economy problems, though Reform and Opening-up policy certainly has brought us  a growing increasingly economy. Please do the deed in need!

哦，哦，看来我英语需要再学习了。顶楼主。

文章选的很好，楼主辛苦了！

楼主还辛苦到为一些生词注音和释义，真是非常细心，为我们阅读带来方便~
另外短小精悍的英语专业短文，大家应该坚持每天阅读~

看看。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

好像Kerry Brown的说法更加花哨难懂，姚教授的说法比较符合思维逻辑