我也是小硕，中国杂志连稿件都不收，直接说：你的稿件与本刊风格不符或者没有任何回复，周末投稿周一他们上班直接退稿。美国编辑回复如下：
Dear ……
I am sorry to inform you that I have decided to reject your submission, MS 16641, entitled "On the Interrelations of………………" for publication in Review of Economic Studies.

Since the full refereeing process is costly and time-consuming, we carefully review each manuscript before subjecting it to this process in order to ensure that it is appropriate for the journal. In particular, we evaluate whether the manuscript has sufficiently high chances of receiving a favorable review, as otherwise the costs to the authors in terms of delay of publication and for the referees in terms of reviewing time are too large. We consider manuscripts not appropriate if the research question is too narrow or the analysis to limited in scope, in which case we think that a timely decision will allow a faster submission to another more fitting journal.

In the case of your submission, I enjoyed reading the main idea in your work. I do think that you are potentially after an important point. Nevertheless, the analysis is at the moment rather reduced both in its theoretical argument and unfortunately in its documentation. The narrative style of the current paper is more suited to a journal that publishes letters. For REStud more formal analysis of the current state and possibly supporting data (either from China or from related cases in history) would make the contribution substantially stronger. Even simply a stronger theoretical focus that makes your assumptions and conclusions more precise would make it more appropriate to this journal.

I understand that it may seem autocratic to make such decisions without the benefit of feedback from reviewers. However, I believe you would prefer receiving a rejection right away than to wait for several months and receive the same decision with a very high probability. Let me again stress that I do see merit in the research agenda, but think that the current contribution is too narrow and would benefit from a clearer tone, a clean model, or clean data. While certainly disappointing in the short run, I hope that in the longer run this outcome will allow a faster publication of your manuscript.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Sincerely,
………………
Joint Managing Editor
Review of Economic Studies

有些杂志必须要副教授以上，有的还必须导师为第一作者，导师第二作者可能不行

看看

唉 现在牛杂志社都是这样 有点狗眼看人低

长见识了，呵呵

呵呵，不评论...

神奇的刊物

伤不起呀

怎么还有这样的，难道和你导师有关系~

论文质量才是第一位

我觉得正常啊

是不是可以认为编辑判断不了你的论文水平到底如何，需要你导师给把关呢？

学习了，第一次听说这样的事

不是我们不知道，是这世界变化快！

一般都是要先有资历，资历也代表了某种程度上得水平

导师未审核同意是不能投稿的，对这个还有疑问的话只能说明太不懂事的。

导师连带责任

原来如此~~~~~

莫非是尊师重道。。。？？

至今还未发过的表示伤不起啊

这种期刊肯定关系稿频发。

我遇到过有的期刊非要导师为第一作者，导师又嫌这个期刊太挫了，哎

这也太。。。那中南大学的本科生出成果怎么办

导师对研究生学术行为有连带责任。不是说发论文之类非带导师不可，是说你独发论文可能带来的不良后果你导师也要承担责任。

就像是：一个小朋友把邻居家的窗户打碎了，尽管他父母没有参与这个行为，但是他父母必须要承担这个后果。

做学生时候肯定得挂名噻，以后自己独立投稿好了，时间的积累

这确实很正常咯,我之前也被要求加上导师的名字和简介,不过没要求是第一作者.我就加在后边了.然后就给发了,也没收版面费

自己一个字一个字敲的，这方面不会出问题。但你说的很对啊……，以后还是慎重把关

学习方舟子在经济学界打假
下面是我批判《经济研究》一篇论文的COMMENT
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1289571-1-1.html
过几天还有一篇传上来

你觉得没问题，导师不一定觉得你没问题啊。
另外，如果你导师在圈里有点名头，万一你写得有待提高，不是给导师抹黑么。