全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学人 二区 学术道德监督
2872 11
2012-12-26
http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~sdellavi/wp/TopJournalsJELDec12LongV5.pdf

David Card, UC Berkeley and NBERStefano DellaVigna, UC Berkeley and NBER December 2012

Abstract



How has publishing in the top journals changed since 1970? Using a data set that combines


information on all articles published in the top‐5 journals from 1970 to 2012 with their


Google Scholar citations, we identify nine key trends. First, annual submissions to the top‐5


journals nearly doubled from 1990 to 2012. Second, the total number of articles published


in these journals actually declined from 400 per year in the late 1970s to 300 per year most


recently. As a result, the acceptance rate has fallen from 15% to 6%, with potential


implications for the career progression of young scholars. Third, one journal, the American


Economic Review, now accounts for 40% of top‐5 publications, up from one‐quarter in the


1970s. Fourth, recently published papers are on average 3 times longer than they were in


the 1970s, contributing to the relative shortage of journal space. Fifth, the number of


authors per paper has increased from 1.3 in 1970 to 2.3 in 2012, partly offsetting the fall in


the number of articles per year. Sixth, citations for top‐5 publications are high: among


papers published in the late 1990s, the median number of Google Scholar citations is 200.


Seventh, the ranking of journals by citations has remained relatively stable, with the notable


exception of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which climbed from fourth place to first


place over the past three decades. Eighth, citation counts are significantly higher for longer


papers and those written by more co‐authors. Ninth, although the fractions of articles from


different fields published in the top‐5 has remained relatively stable, there are important


cohort trends in the citations received by papers from different fields, with rising citations to


more recent papers in Development and International, and declining citations to recent


papers in Econometrics and Theory.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2012-12-26 08:43:37
看看是啥东西
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-12-26 08:56:07
这个今天刚看过了,微博上传的很凶。

其实这个道理对于大部分senior phd和AP来说,基本上是个共识了。随便翻开一本非journal,中国人都是一大把,呵呵,仔细看看,其实也基本上符合这篇论文讲的东西,如合作者人数增加等。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-12-26 09:01:24
记得前些年JPE还等了一篇类似的文章。可以对比来看,夸克,要不你一并贴出来。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-12-26 09:43:45
lustboy 发表于 2012-12-26 10:01
记得前些年JPE还等了一篇类似的文章。可以对比来看,夸克,要不你一并贴出来。
能告诉我的题目么?露怯了,那篇文章我没有看过。。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-12-26 10:58:34
看题目很吸引人啊,下下来好好读一读~
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

加微信,拉你入群
微信外可尝试点击本链接进入