Do you know you have already raise two questions? which are different in nature!

1)为什么大家都在学凯恩斯，冷落了哈耶克?

The "obvious" difference between them is "intervention to the market". Let's say, if you were the government, you want let the market show the people its curing power to economic problems, or show your "power" to the people and let them know how you "solve" the problem??

2) 凯恩斯和哈耶克孰对孰错？
It depends... if you are studying econ, you know what it means.....

因为凯恩斯的观点一直有人发展传承更新，哈耶克的观点已经非主流了吧。

没有对错吧，在合适的时间用正确的模式，无为无不为，更要顺势而为

The "obvious" difference between them is "intervention to the market". Let's say, if you were the government, you want let the market show the people its curing power to economic problems, or show your "power" to the people and let them know how you "solve" the problem?
是这么解释的。

凯恩斯主义更加符合ZF需求，但是由于目前的ZF监管，财政支出的结构性歧视和央企、国企的不平等竞争的存在，扭曲了市场利率，使得短期利率水平高于了长期利率水平，造成了投机性需求大于投资性需求的问题，带来了目前的经济窘境，要搞市场经济就必须相信市场，必须靠市场来自我修复经济，不能做顶着凯恩斯的帽子干计划经济的事。

张五常......他的论文就属于他说的99%