全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 行为经济学与实验经济学
2690 1
2007-12-31

However, I do not think that you get it right because I do not think
that you have started from the vantage point of seeing things through the point of view of the authors.
Especially you have not started from the vantage point
that utility maximization, whatever that utility may be describes human
behavior. That is not my view but the view of
every professional economist. But then it becomes necessary to actually
categorize what the utility function is.
 
your comments  fail to understand what
economists do with utility functions (as for example
Gary Becker) then I think that you cannot begin to understand the
purpose of the book

what does this mean ?

how can we evaluate utility theory? please help.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2008-1-4 07:29:00

红字部分主要在说: 笔者不赞同多数出他自己之外的专业经济学家所支持的效用理论以及效用最大化理论能够很好的解释人类行为。他认为应该更好的对效用的功能进行分类,而不是眉毛胡子一把抓的像Gary Becker等人那样。 他还表达了对"you"的不满,认为没有领会对自己的意思。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群