分布式经济这个词最好联系范围经济、规模经济两个概念一起理解,这里说的经济并不是说经济体,而是说能取得更为经济的效果。分布式经济就是说通过将生产、服务、网络传输等在物理上或空间上分散分布,从而提高效率、取得更有效率的结果。
P2P网络技术体现了分布式经济。传统的下载方式只能使用户通过一条网络路径下载,所有用户都要从主服务器下载数据,容易造成网络拥堵、服务器繁忙甚至瘫痪,而通过P2P网络,用户下载数据的同时,也同时向外发送数据,使服务器提供数据源的功能在网络空间上分布开来,解放了服务器的负荷,从而提高了下载的效率,形成了更为经济有效的网络传输方式。
似乎以前听说还有种方格式计算的概念,也是体现了分布式经济思想,将大型数据运算分布到无数多个服务器甚至PC上进行,以使得运用相对落后的计算机硬件条件进行大型数据运算成为可能。不过不知道目前是否在用。
至于进一步信息,请参阅:
| The Solution? A Distributed Economy | | | |
| Written by Maaarrrk |
| Tuesday, 25 July 2006 |
20 years ago I would have told you that purchasing products cheaply is the best for the economy. The basic Walmart globalization view. The problem was that the same people buying products were employed making products too. It did not matter how cheaply they can buy products if they have lost their job and ability to purchase items. If customers don't have good paying jobs, it doesn't matter how inexpensive the products are. Another major problem is that the manufacturing infrastructure portfolio becomes centralized with just a few low cost producers making most of the goods. The more centralized the infrastructure the more vulnerable it is to disruption due to natural disaster or war. Just like maintaining a diversified investment portfolio protects you from Enron or Worldcom type disasters, a diversified manufacturing infrastructure actually provides a macroeconomic BENEFIT. No one war or hurricane will not stop the economy of a country. Much of our problems in the mid-east today are due to the over centralization of fuel on one type of source in an inexpensive by small part of the world. The western world's economy can be held hostage by a few highly motivated people. Globalization has not help the 3rd world countries like we once hoped. The lack of legal, environmental and health standards in 3rd world countries keep the manufacturing jobs from having a large benefit to the average citizens. Even worse, the 3rd world farmers have to compete against the high mechanized western farmers. The result can be a loss of standard of living to a 3rd world country instead of a gain. The promise of world peace and prosperity from globalization will never be fulfilled. In the race to make items cheaper we are really throwing away infrastructure diversity and natural economic safe guards. Maybe we need to look back at the pre-WWII USA economic model. Each region of the country grew its on food and provided much of the raw material for local manufacturing. Individual items may have been expensive but the economy could handle disruptions to different regions without the whole country's economy being disrupted. Transportation costs (fuel) were not as important. Jobs were more readily available for the average citizen. I seriously think that the first political party that totally rethinks the post-WWII economic model and comes up with a new safer model will lead this country for the next couple of generations. |
http://fiscalconservatives.org/content/view/48/2/
希望我的答案能让你满意。