英文文献：An Overview Of The Mixed Investment Housing Model In South Africa; An International Comparative Literature Review-南非混合投资住宅模式概述国际比较文献综述
英文文献作者：Simbanegavi Prisca,Ijasan Kola
英文文献摘要：
PURPOSE: of this research is to compare “mixed housing development” models in South Africa with international models through literature review as an overall background to understanding urban housing developments.DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This research is designed as a comparative study employed to analyze important aspects while fruitless aspects are dropped out. Aspects of comparison include; the definition, regulations and institutions, benefits and challenges, sources of funds and government subsidies, management and sustainability of mixed residential developments. Desktop analysis of literature is the instrument used to study the model.FINDINGS: Results of this study show that what mixed housing endvours to achieve are the same globally. Inclusionary policies that create this model create heterogeneous housing markets where low income people live together with high income people in the same neighborhoods. The main difference is that in South Africa, mixed residential developments remain occupied by disadvantaged race class where as in other countries advantaged classes (who are usually of ethnic backgrounds) indeed live together with disadvantaged classes. In most countries, inclusionary housing policy that creates these integrated developments have been legislated but not yet legislated in South Africa implying a more market-rate approach.ORIGINALITY/VALUE: As a contribution, this paper places mixed housing developments into an international setting as a way of evaluating the South African model against international standards in assessing the effectiveness of housing policies. This reading is good background reading for researchers, policy makers, developers and housing consumers. In most countries, inclusionary housing policy that creates these integrated have been legislated but not yet legislated in South Africa implying a more market-rate approach. “Research has suggested that the post-apartheid communities developing in Lehae and Chief Mogale are not spaces in which race has reduced in its importance”(Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, 2013) as a social identity. As a contribution, this paper places mixed housing developments into an international setting as a way of evaluating the South African model against international standards in assessing the effectiveness of housing policies.

目的:本研究的目的是通过文献综述，将南非的“混合住宅开发”模式与国际模式进行比较，作为理解城市住宅开发的整体背景。设计/方法/方法:本研究设计为比较研究，分析重要的方面，剔除无用的方面。比较的方面包括:混合住宅的定义、法规和制度、效益和挑战、资金来源和政府补贴、管理和可持续性。文献桌面分析是研究模型的工具。发现:这项研究的结果表明，在全球范围内，混合住房的endvours所达到的效果是相同的。创造了这一模式的包容性政策创造了异质住房市场低收入人群和高收入人群住在同一个社区。主要的区别是，在南非，混合住宅开发仍然是由弱势种族阶层占据，而在其他国家有利阶层(通常是种族背景)确实与弱势阶层生活在一起。在大多数国家，创造这些综合发展的包容性住房政策已经立法，但在南非尚未立法，这意味着一种更市场化的做法。原创性/价值:作为贡献，本文将混合住宅发展纳入国际环境，作为一种评估南非模式与评估住房政策有效性的国际标准的方法。对于研究人员、政策制定者、开发商和住房消费者来说，这一数据是很好的背景数据。在大多数国家，创造这些一体化的包容性住房政策已经立法，但在南非尚未立法，这意味着一种更市场化的方法。“研究表明，在Lehae和Chief Mogale发展的后种族隔离社区中，种族作为社会身份的重要性并没有降低”(Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, 2013)。作为贡献，本文将混合住房发展纳入国际环境，作为一种评估南非模式和国际标准在评估住房政策的有效性的方法。