<p>Slowdown in economy likely to have<br/>only marginal impact<br/>&#1048599; More M&amp;A opportunities exist for gas<br/>players with strong balance sheets<br/>&#1048599; BEH our top pick on its defensive merits<br/>Gas operators’ prompt move to combat slowdown in<br/>property market. In view of the stagnant property market,<br/>city gas operators have shifted their focus to increasing<br/>connections for old buildings and economic houses (with<br/>floor space below 90 sq m). We do not expect the slowdown<br/>in the property market to affect city gas operators much.<br/>Gas demand remains solid. Supported by a natural gas<br/>price advantage and the Chinese government’s energy<br/>consumption policy, gas demand in China is likely to remain<br/>strong. Any reduction in gas demand from the city gas<br/>operators’ existing commercial and industrial users will be<br/>easily taken up by new customers, but with a time lag.<br/>More consolidation opportunities emerge for strong gas<br/>players. Due to the recent share price pullback, many city gas<br/>operators’ valuations appear attractive. We believe the current<br/>market circumstance provides opportunities to gas players who<br/>have solid balance sheets to expand their businesses.<br/>BEH is our preferred gas operator. We lower our target<br/>prices for city gas operators to reflect: (1) lower projections<br/>of new connections; (2) lower forecasts of piped gas sales<br/>volume; (3) a change of our valuation methodology to one<br/>blending DCF-based valuation with PE-based valuation. Our<br/>top pick is BEH, as it has more reliable earnings and a<br/>stronger balance sheet than competitors, which allow it to<br/>become one of the major consolidators to benefit from the<br/>business opportunities in the fast growing gas market.</p><p>目录</p><p>Investment summary 4<br/>Marginal impact of slowdown in property market 4<br/>Gas sales remain robust 4<br/>More M&amp;A opportunities emerges for gas players with<br/>strong balance sheet 4<br/>Valuations and ratings 5<br/>BEH – our top pick 8<br/>Upside and downside risks to sector 9<br/>Impact of slowdown in<br/>property development 13<br/>China’s property market is cooling down 13<br/>Expansion strategy changed to reduce impact 13<br/>Assumptions changed for pipeline construction business 14<br/>Price and policy support<br/>strong gas demand 15<br/>Natural gas retains a price advantage in China 15<br/>Government continues to encourage natural gas usage 15<br/>More M&amp;A opportunities<br/>emerge for strong players 17<br/>Valuations appear attractive 17<br/>Strong gas players will become the consolidators 18<br/>Company highlights 19<br/>Beijing Enterprises 20<br/>Xinao Gas 25<br/>China Gas 30<br/>Towngas China 36<br/>HKCG 40<br/>Appendix 44<br/>Appendix 1: PE band charts 45<br/>Appendix 2: PB band charts 46<br/>Appendix 3: Winners and losers 47<br/>Disclosure appendix 49<br/>Disclaimer 54<br/>Contents</p><p>Investment summary<br/>&#1048599; We expect the slowdown in the property market to affect city gas<br/>operators only marginally, as they move to increase connections<br/>in old buildings and economic houses<br/>&#1048599; More M&amp;A opportunities exist for gas players who have strong<br/>balance sheets and cash positions<br/>&#1048599; Our top pick is BEH, due to its defensive merits - reliable<br/>earnings, no connection fee exposure and strong balance sheet</p><p>Marginal impact of slowdown<br/>in property market<br/>As around 50-60% of city gas operators’<br/>residential connection fee revenues come from<br/>new buildings, the recent slowdown in the<br/>property market could affect the city gas<br/>operators’ pipeline construction business. To<br/>minimize the impact of this slowdown, city gas<br/>operators have shifted their focus to increasing<br/>connections in old buildings and economic houses<br/>(which floor space is below 90 sq m), which are<br/>promoted by the Chinese government. We believe<br/>that once the government’s economic housing<br/>policy succeeds, the pipeline construction<br/>business will pick up. Therefore, we lower our<br/>new connection rollouts assumption for city gas<br/>operators by only 1-9% pa for 2008-10.<br/>Gas sales remain robust<br/>According to the city gas operators, as most of<br/>their major commercial and industrial (C/I) users<br/>are non-export manufacturers, their operations are<br/>not significantly affected by the deceleration in<br/>global trade.</p><p>We believe that domestic natural gas will<br/>maintain its price advantage (see page 15) even if<br/>China cuts its oil product prices. Because of this<br/>advantage and the Chinese government’s policy<br/>of encouraging the use of natural gas (targeting an<br/>increase from 3.5% of total energy consumption<br/>in 2007 to 10% by 2020), we estimate gas demand<br/>in China should remain solid going forward. Thus,<br/>we agree with the management of city gas<br/>operators that any decline in gas demand from<br/>existing C/I customers will easily be taken up by<br/>other C/I users. However, we believe there might<br/>be a time lag to find new customers, and as a<br/>result, we lower our gas sales volume assumptions<br/>for city gas operators by 1-9% pa for 2008-10.<br/>More M&amp;A opportunities<br/>emerges for gas players with<br/>strong balance sheet<br/>Attractive valuation<br/>Due to the current financial market turmoil, city<br/>gas operators’ share prices have dropped<br/>significantly, making them attractive; all the city<br/>gas operators are trading at their PB troughs.<br/>China Gas and Towngas China are trading at</p><p>discounts of 23-49% to their 2008 book values.<br/>Our equity replacement value (ERV) analysis<br/>suggests that Xinao Gas is trading at a discount to<br/>its replacement value (vs. trading at a premium to<br/>its book value). China Gas and Towngas China<br/>are trading at even larger discounts of 51-56% to<br/>their replacement values than to their book values.<br/>Thus, hypothetically it would be cheaper to buy<br/>these companies than to build comparable entities.<br/>Strong gas players should be the<br/>winners<br/>Affected by the tightening credit market, it is<br/>increasing difficult for potential buyers to finance<br/>sizeable acquisitions. However, companies like<br/>Petrochina, China Resources Holdings and BEH,<br/>which either have large cash on hand or strong<br/>balance sheets, are able to acquire quality assets to<br/>expand their gas businesses.<br/>Valuations and ratings<br/>Earnings revisions<br/>We have reduced our 2008-10e earnings forecasts<br/>for the city gas operators after factoring in: (1) the</p><p>probability that there will be fewer new<br/>connection rollouts than initially expected; and (2)<br/>the projection of lower growth in gas sales<br/>volume than foreseen earlier.<br/>Earnings sensitivity<br/>The following charts show the sensitivity of city<br/>gas operators’ 2009e earnings to the key earnings<br/>drivers, i.e. number of new connections,<br/>connection fee, piped gas sales volume, piped gas<br/>sales price, LPG sales volume, LPG price and<br/>interest rate.<br/>Of the group, Xinao Gas relies the most on<br/>connection fee income; its earnings are the most<br/>sensitive to changes in the number of new<br/>connections and connection fee. As China Gas has<br/>the lowest profit margin for gas sales, it shows the<br/>highest earnings sensitivity to piped gas sales<br/>volume and price. China Gas and Towngas China<br/>show higher earnings sensitivity to LPG price and<br/>sales volume as gross profits from their LPG<br/>businesses account for a higher proportion of<br/>overall gross profits than they do at Xinao Gas. In<br/>terms of earnings sensitivity to interest rates, our</p><p>analysis shows that China Gas is the most<br/>exposed to interest rate hikes, given that it has the<br/>highest gearing in the peer group.<br/>HSBC versus consensus<br/>Our 2008-10e earnings forecasts for BEH, Xinao<br/>Gas, China Gas and Towngas China differ from<br/>consensus by -3% to -7%, -0.4% to +2%, -42% to<br/>+0.9% and -3% to -10%, respectively, mainly for<br/>the following reasons:<br/>&#1048599; BEH: We believe the market has not factored<br/>in the slowdown in gas sales of Hua You, a<br/>subsidiary of BEH.<br/>&#1048599; Xinao Gas: Our 2008-09 earnings estimates are<br/>generally in line with market consensus<br/>estimates. Our 2010 earnings estimate is slightly<br/>higher than consensus, as we assume the margin<br/>on its LPG business will expand faster once the<br/>production of DME reaches scale.<br/>&#1048599; China Gas: Our FY09-10e earnings forecasts<br/>are significantly lower than consensus, as we<br/>believe the street has underestimated the<br/>finance costs and has not factored in the<br/>slowdown in new connection rollouts and gas<br/>sales growth. However, our FY11 earnings<br/>estimate is in line with the market forecast, as<br/>we assume the company’s net gearing will<br/>drop substantially once it reduces its<br/>acquisition pace and more city gas projects<br/>commence operations.<br/>&#1048599; Towngas China: Compared with consensus, we<br/>factored in lower projections of new connection<br/>rollouts and piped gas sales growth.<br/>Our 2008-10 earrings forecasts for HKCG are<br/>3-18% below consensus forecasts, due to different<br/>assumptions about its China gas business and its<br/>investment income.</p><p>Change of valuation methodology<br/>Previously, we employed only a discounted cash<br/>flow (DCF) method to derive the underlying value<br/>of city gas operators. Given that investors’<br/>perception of value is easily affected by the<br/>industry cycle and market sentiment (e.g., they<br/>discount a company’s underlying value during a<br/>down cycle, and vice versa), DCF-based valuation<br/>is not enough to truly reflect a company’s<br/>potential share price. Therefore, we change our<br/>valuation methodology by blending PE-based<br/>valuation with DCF-based valuation to derive<br/>target prices for the city gas operators. For BEH<br/>and HKCG, we retain a sum-of-the-parts<br/>valuation methodology, as their businesses span<br/>several different sectors, requiring different<br/>valuation methodologies.</p><p>After lowering our earnings forecasts and<br/>incorporating HSBC’s latest cost of equity (3.5%<br/>risk-free rate and 10.5% market risk premium vs.<br/>previous 4% risk-free rate and 7.5% market risk<br/>premium), our DCF-based values for city gas<br/>operators dropped by 22-36%. As Xinao Gas has<br/>been listed the longest of any company in the<br/>group, we use its last down cycle PE, of 10x, as a<br/>benchmark to derive PE-based values. Therefore,<br/>our target prices for city gas operators are cut by 9-<br/>46%. We reiterate our Overweight (V) ratings on<br/>BEH, Xinao Gas, China Gas and Towngas China,<br/>as they provide 33-102% potential total returns.<br/>We have a Neutral (V) rating on HKCG.<br/>BEH – our top pick<br/>We prefer BEH to Xinao Gas, China Gas and<br/>Towngas China as it is defensive for a volatile<br/>market; with more reliable earnings from its gas<br/>business, and it has no exposure to the connection<br/>fee issue. Also, with a net cash position of<br/>HKD1.3bn in 2008, BEH is well-equipped to<br/>acquire gas assets to expand its gas business and<br/>capture opportunities in the fast growing natural gas<br/>market. If acquisitions can be concluded, we see a<br/>potential upside to earnings. Our target price, of<br/>HKD35.60, suggests 33% total potential return.</p><p>As for Xinao Gas and China Gas, given their<br/>exposure to the connection fee issue, they are<br/>more vulnerable to the economic downtrend,<br/>causing their share prices to be volatile.<br/>Upside and downside risks to<br/>sector<br/>The key upside risks to the sector include: (1) more<br/>cities being allowed to adopt the automatic gas cost<br/>pass-through mechanism; (2) more city gas operators<br/>vertically integrating into upstream business; (3) the<br/>development of economic houses is hastened; (4)<br/>higher-than-expected gas sales volume; and (5)<br/>margin expansion in LPG business.</p><p>Downside risks to the sector include: (1) city gas<br/>operators being unable to pass through their<br/>increased upstream costs to customers; (2) the<br/>cancellation of connection fees without any<br/>compensation; (3) lower-than-expected gas sales<br/>volume; and (4) credit market tightening.</p><p></p><p>
<br/></p><p></p>