全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学人 二区 学术资源/课程/会议/讲座 论文版
2085 1
2009-04-19

1.Our approach reveals that stock returns and dividend-price ratios are too volatile to be accounted for by news about future dividends. Further, this excess volatility is closely related to the predictability of multiperiod returns. It has recently been shown that stock returns are more highly predictable when they are measured over intervals of several years, rather than over short intervals of a year or less.

2.a plot of at and 3' (Figure 1) shows a suggestion of short-run coherence, even though the overall correlation between the two is virtually zero. Our VAR results also indicate that the dividend-price ratio helps to forecast short-run dividend changes.

这两句具体是什么含义?内容理解相冲突吗?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2009-4-20 09:45:00

1.我们的做法表明,股票收益和股息价格比率是不稳定的,因此不能以此推测未来的红利。此外,波动率与预期收益是密切相关。它最近已经表明,每隔几年,股票收益更高度可预测性时,而不是短期间隔一年或更少。

2.一块在和3 ' (图1 )显示,建议短期内的一致性,即使整体的相关性两者之间的几乎为零。VAR结果还表明,股利性价比有助于预测短期红利变化

大致是这样的意思,内容理解是冲突的

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群