1\Lavie (2006) and Pablo et al. (2007) also address the cost of dynamic capabilities by suggesting that dynamic capabilities involve substantial cognitive, managerial andoperational costs and that deploying dynamic capabilities requires high levels of time and energy from committed managers. Lavie (2006) and Pablo et al. (2007) 也指出过动态能力成本，他们认为动态能力包括大量的意识、管理以及运营成本，以及动态能力的配置需要任命的经理们投入大量的时间和精力。 2\we might question whether quantitative methods are particularly appropriate. Quantitative studies usually involve statistically valid large sample sizes which result in quantitatively aggregated responses in order to advance theory via the inference of common trends (Armstrong and Shimizu 2007), and it may be difficult to collect any longitudinal data via archival sources or structured surveys (Danneels 2007). 我们也许会质疑定量的方法是否合适。定量的方法通常包括有效统计的大量样本，而这导致了过分自信的回应来更新或者超越理论。
抱歉，后面的不知道怎么翻译
1# moumou848

1\Lavie (2006) and Pablo et al. (2007) also address the cost of dynamic capabilities by suggesting that
dynamic capabilities involve substantial cognitive, managerial and operational costs and that deploying dynamic capabilities requires  high levels of time and energy from committed managers.
  Lavie 和pablo et al分别在2006和2007年探讨过动态能力的成本问题，他们认为动态能力包括大量的认知成 本，管理和运营成本，还包括利用动态能力所需要尽职的职业经理人所投入的大量时间和精力。
2\ we might question whether quantitative methods are particularly appropriate. Quantitative
   studies usually involve statistically valid large sample sizes which result in quantitatively
aggregated responses in order to advance theory via the inference of common trends
(Armstrong and Shimizu 2007), and it may be difficult to collect any longitudinal data via
archival sources or structured surveys (Danneels 2007).
  我们也许会质疑定量研究方法是否会非常合适。Armstrong and Shimizu 在2007年指出定量研究通常包括大量有效的统计样本，为了通过推断普遍的趋势推动理论进展这些样本将会引起数量上的整体反应，Danneels 在2007年也指出通过模型数据或者结构型研究来收集纵向数据也许是非常困难的。