黃河泉 发表于 2017-2-26 09:12 
你可再试试1. 你的 iv 里有 year,所以解释变量加入 i.year 可能较适当! 2. ci 与 gdp 担心有内生性,请取 ...
我把 i 改成了 l 后跑着试了下,工具变量数目明显减少,已经小于组的数量了。但是,niis的p值是 0.895,明显不显著了。检验结果:Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -1.19 Pr > z = 0.232,Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(11) = 24.13 Prob > chi2 = 0.012,
(Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)
Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(11) = 12.41 Prob > chi2 = 0.334
(Robust, but can be weakened by many instruments.)
Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
GMM instruments for levels
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(8) = 10.69 Prob > chi2 = 0.220
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(3) = 1.72 Prob > chi2 = 0.633
iv(year)
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(10) = 12.34 Prob > chi2 = 0.263
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(1) = 0.07 Prob > chi2 = 0.789
这结果能用么?还是说这个关系就是不显著,没有明显的影响?