zxbball 发表于 2009-8-25 12:59 When the United States borrows $1 from foreigners, it is selling them an asset—a promise that they will be repaid $1, with interest, in the future. Such a transaction enters the financial account with a positive sign because the loan is itself a payment to the United States, or a financial inflow (also sometimes called a capital inflow).

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-25 12:59 When the United States borrows $1 from foreigners, it is selling them an asset—a promise that they will be repaid $1, with interest, in the future. Such a transaction enters the financial account with a positive sign because the loan is itself a payment to the United States, or a financial inflow (also sometimes called a capital inflow).

sunrukun 发表于 2009-8-25 23:03
there is not "asset outflow" in the article i guess.  

"it is selling them an asset"  the auther means that a financial product which wil come up with interest in the further. for example, US goverment bond or company bond.

foreign capital flows in USA buying US ASSET. asset mostly can not outflow. capital is something equal money as i understand.

"capital flight：a large and sudden reduction in the demand for assets located in a country。"

means domestic capital r not interest in domestic asset and flow out to other countries for better and safe return.


hope helpfull for u

sungmoo 发表于 2009-8-26 00:14
简单说，如果你认定了“谁对谁投资”，就认定了“谁在输出资本，谁在输入资本”。

A对B投资：A在输出资本，同时，B在输入资本。

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-26 09:28 这里资本指美元咯！

sungmoo 发表于 2009-8-26 09:48

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-26 09:28 这里资本指美元咯！

也不能这么说。

你持有了美元（这种资产），就已经进行“对美投资”（“对美输出资本”）了。

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-27 08:41 说白了，我们出口的物品拿回美元就已经对美国输出资本了，这个资本就是我们的生产的鞋子！我们出口创汇，就是为了将来买美国的高科技产品！

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-27 08:41 这么简单的事情，怎么在国贸的课本上弄的这么扰，还分了借方、贷方！

sungmoo 发表于 2009-8-27 09:01

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-27 08:41 说白了，我们出口的物品拿回美元就已经对美国输出资本了，这个资本就是我们的生产的鞋子！我们出口创汇，就是为了将来买美国的高科技产品！

这里，判定“输出资本”的关键是，你出口时拿到（或换回）了“对美国的索取权凭证”（在上面，就是美元。当然，不限于美元）。

如果你没有拿回美元，而是“以物易物”，就没有输出资本了。

zxbball 发表于 2009-8-27 09:51 哦！资本还是指钱（债权）！