审核时间很长的说

这是一位美国网友的留言，大家看看，      
“…nations who subsidize their exports effectively steal jobs from other countries — “turn out to be valid.”
     Dr. Krugman, this is exactly what the developing countries have been screaming about our, and Europe’s, agricultural subsidies: We have been stealing agricultural jobs from the third world countries for eons destroying their agricultural base!
         As for import restrictions, for example, just recall that tariffs and restrictions on sugar have been in place since long before we were even talking to “Red China”. As a result we have the highest sugar prices in the world. Trade barriers by us are nothing new and have little to do with China. Should I mention how Harley-Davidson was saved from Japanese competition?
       It is very disappointing that whenever you rail against the Chinese trade surplus with the USA, you fail to mention that about 60% of this surplus goes to American companies operating out of China. They inflate the import (transfer) prices to show smaller profit here in order to pay fewer taxes, and keep profits abroad paying no taxes at all.
      China does not force us to buy from them. Greedy and socially irresponsible American corporations, engaged in labor arbitrage and tax evasion, in collusion with the “for sale” congress and the White House, are the main problem. Let us clean up our glass house first.

克老认为我国现在实行的是重商主义的政策啊。。。。。。重商主义的主张是保护关税吧~现在我倒是没有看到我国的保护关税政策，倒是看到美国的关税保护的说。。。

要数据做什么？ 他都说了“当就业不充分时，……所有错误的重商主义观点”（即对出口提供补贴的国家实际上是从其他国家偷取工作）“变为有效”我们现在就是需要通过压低汇率来保证出口企业的就业，这不违反经济规律。有本事的就来拉高人民币的汇率好了。克鲁格的这篇文章满是废话，说了跟没说一样。学过基本经济学原理的人都知道这是怎么一回事。这世界上没有一个国家没这么做过的，只不过深度和广度不一样罢了。

要说失业，中国应该算得上是数量庞大吧？就业真是个问题呀！！
要说经济发展，我们人均连韩国还不如呀~简单的说一点，不用听外国人瞎喊，不要干涉中国内政嘛！不要你们外国人一吃点亏就来找我们报销，从古至今总是这样！如果有一天我们的经济发展停滞了，你回来救我们吗？？俗套一点说，国家利益是国际关系的根本吧，所以，谁也别埋怨谁

喷血。。。。。

看不懂。这老兄越发虚了！

中国就业有问题，别怪什么出口。

中国就业问题的根子是——————垄断经济占主体地位；税收太重；对创业和经营的限制和税收太多；吸血虫似的城管和工商人员太多。。。。