第一次用系统GMM方法,按部就班地按照网上的资料修改了程序,不知道跑出来的这个结果能不能用,希望大家帮忙分析指正一下哇!
475个公司的10年数据,程序是:xtabond2 lnl l.lnl lny lnk, gmm(l.lnl) iv(lny lnk) nolevel twostep robust
Dynamic panel-data estimation, two-step difference GMM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group variable: stkcd Number of obs = 3778
Time variable : accper Number of groups = 475
Number of instruments = 38 Obs per group: min = 2
Wald chi2(3) = 473.92 avg = 7.95
Prob > chi2 = 0.000 max = 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Corrected
lnl | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
lnl |
L1. | .4895885 .0749475 6.53 0.000 .3426941 .6364829
|
lny | .2367237 .0429589 5.51 0.000 .1525259 .3209215
lnk | .0941103 .0329993 2.85 0.004 .0294329 .1587877
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instruments for first differences equation
Standard
D.(lny lnk)
GMM-type (missing=0, separate instruments for each period unless collapsed)
L(1/9).L.lnl
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arellano-Bond test for AR(1) in first differences: z = -6.11 Pr > z = 0.000
Arellano-Bond test for AR(2) in first differences: z = -0.32 Pr > z = 0.751
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sargan test of overid. restrictions: chi2(35) = 80.56 Prob > chi2 = 0.000
(Not robust, but not weakened by many instruments.)
Hansen test of overid. restrictions: chi2(35) = 40.18 Prob > chi2 = 0.251
(Robust, but can be weakened by many instruments.)
Difference-in-Hansen tests of exogeneity of instrument subsets:
Hansen test excluding group: chi2(33) = 38.66 Prob > chi2 = 0.229
Difference (null H = exogenous): chi2(2) = 1.52 Prob > chi2 = 0.468
.
end of do-file