感谢zhkim5858

1377

收藏 2010-04-30

Land Economics 85(1):144-161 (2009);

This Article

	Full Text (PDF)
	References
	Alert me when this article is cited
	Alert me if a correction is posted
	Citation Map

Services

	Email this article to a friend
	Similar articles in this journal
	Alert me to new issues of the journal
	Download to citation manager


Citing Articles

	Citing Articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

	Articles by Chang, H.-H.
	Articles by Boisvert, R. N.
	Search for Related Content

Distinguishing between Whole-Farm vs. Partial-Farm Participation in the Conservation Reserve ProgramHung-Hao Chang and Richard N. Boisvert By distinguishing between the decision to participate in the conservation reserve program (CRP) and the decision for whole-farm vs. part-farm participation, we model participation as separate binary decisions. Our results suggest the farm characteristics and other factors affect the decision to participate in CRP differently than the decision regarding whole-farm vs. part-farm participation. This model formulation also helps to clarify the conditions under which the effect of CRP payments on the acreage enrolled in the program is positive or negative. (JEL Q15, Q18)

http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/1/144

扫码加我拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

全部回复

zhkim5858

2010-4-30 21:01:08

Adjacency Externalities and Forest Fire Prevention
Christian S L Crowley, Arun S Malik, Gregory S Amacher, Robert G Haight. Land Economics. Madison: Feb 2009. Vol. 85, Iss. 1; pg. 162
Abstract (Summary)
This paper models landowner behavior on timberland subject to damage by fire. We examine how management decisions by adjacent landowners yield outcomes that diverge from the social optimum, and consider how this divergence depends on landowner preferences and information. We conduct a numerical simulation in which landowners interact through the effects of their fire prevention activities on a common risk of fire. The results reveal significant social inefficiencies related to externalities associated with private fuel treatment decisions. We consider a policy for aligning social and private decisions by requiring landowners to share the government's cost of fire suppression. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]