[size=33.3333px]Incentives to provide local public goods:[size=33.3333px]Fiscal Federalism, Russian Style*[size=23.3333px]
[size=23.3333px]Ekaterina V. Zhuravskaya
Harvard University May 12, 1998
Abstract
This paper investigates how the institutional structure of the government affects theincentives of local governments to provide public goods both to individuals andprivate businesses. Using a unique data set on budgets of Russian cities, I show thatthe existing revenue sharing schemes between regional and local governments providelocal governments with no fiscal incentive to increase their tax base and, therefore, tofoster the growth of businesses. The main result is that in Russia, any change in localgovernment’s own revenues is almost entirely offset by changes in shared revenues.This situation leads to predatory governmental behavior towards private businesses.This finding is compared to the structure of federalism in China, where fiscalincentives are very strong. Some evidence is provided that local governments’ fiscalincentives are an important determinant of (1) the formation of private businesses, (2)the allocation of local public finances among different uses, and (3) the efficiency ofpublic goods provision at the local level. These findings shed some light on the puzzleof why Russia has grown more slowly and has less efficient public goods provision,compared to other countries undertaking economic reforms.