全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 制度经济学
3695 6
2005-01-21

求论文:Langlois, R.H., 1986, "The New Institutional Economics: An Introductory Essay"。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2005-1-21 18:23:00
帮你找找看!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-1-21 18:27:00
谢谢“萨缪尔森”
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-1-23 09:52:00

这是Langlois主编的论文集“Economics as a Process:Essays in the New Institutional Economics”中Langlois 的导言,可惜我没有电子版。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-1-25 15:33:00

maybe you can only see it in hardbook, no electronical one is available

but one of his paper

"What Was Wrong with the 'Old' Institutional Economics? (And What Is Still Wrong with the 'New'?)" Review of Political Economy 1(3): 272-300 (November 1989). Translated into Danish and reprinted in Christian Knudsen, ed., Institutionalismen i Samfundsvidenskaberne. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 1989, pp. 9-43

make a redress about his views, maybe you can see it

"

In my editor's introduction to a 1986 collection of essays (Langlois1986a), I made the rather strong and controversial claim that, in the dim mists of modern economic theory, one could perceive the outlines of a “new Institutional Economics” — and that the essays in the volume somehow fit together as representatives of that developing program. In reviews that were otherwise quite kind, Coats (1986) and Maki (1987) took me to task for these sweeping suggestions of programmatic unity. Moreover, they both chastised me a bit for a too-hasty and somewhat distorted dismissal of the “old Institutional Economics” of Veblen, Commons, et al. To all of these charges I must reluctantly plead guilty, or at least nolo contendere.

...................

8439.rar
大小:(34.42 KB)

 马上下载

本附件包括:

  • chapter8.doc

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-1-25 16:46:00
谢谢sen的推荐!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群