摘要翻译：
本文的研究领域是两个学科之间的交流分析。在微观维度的限制下，通过引入权力维度和交换动机，它对标准经济理论进行了扩展。基本的参考是那些经济学家的反思，特别是约翰·肯尼思·加尔布雷斯，他们批评从新古典经济中删除“权力”维度。我们还提到了加尔布雷斯等人对新古典经济学家的假设所作的批评，即交换中的“动机”仅仅与报酬、与在交换中获得的金钱联系在一起。我们通过直接考虑对每个主体的福利的影响，而不管这些影响是以何种手段实现的，从而绕过了拥有大量类型的权力和大量形式的动机的问题：也就是说，将谈判过程中发生的一切事情与由于具体形式的权力的行使而在每个主体身上引起的福利功能的潜在的或实际的变化联系起来，在个案的基础上，与进行交换的动机的强度联系起来。在建立数学模型的过程中，我们非常注意其在现场试验中的实用性。
---
英文标题：
《The "power" dimension in a process of exchange》
---
作者：
Alberto Banterle
---
最新提交年份：
2019
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  The field of study of this paper is the analysis of the exchange between two subjects. Circumscribed to the micro dimension, it is however expanded with respect to standard economic theory by introducing both the dimension of power and the motivation to exchange. The basic reference is made by the reflections of those economists, preeminently John Kenneth Galbraith, who criticize the removal from the neoclassical economy of the "power" dimension. We have also referred to the criticism that Galbraith, among others, makes to the assumption of neoclassical economists that the "motivation" in exchanges is solely linked to the reward, to the money obtained in the exchange. We have got around the problem of having a large number of types of power and also a large number of forms of motivation by directly taking into account the effects on the welfare of each subject, regardless of the means with which they are achieved: that is, referring to everything that happens in the negotiation process to the potential or real variations of the welfare function induced in each subject due to the exercise of the specific form of power, on a case by case basis, and of the intensity of the motivation to perform the exchange. In the construction of a mathematical model we paid great attention to its usability in field testing.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.08293