全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学人 二区 外文文献专区
324 0
2022-04-04
摘要翻译:
为了评价科学研究的质量,我们引入了一个新的科学绩效度量家族,称为科学研究度量(SRM)。我们的建议源于风险度量理论的最新发展,是为了解决现有文献计量指标的许多问题。我们所介绍的SRM是基于整个科学家的引文记录,并且是一致的,因为它们具有相同的结构性质;灵活适应不同地区、不同年龄的特点;粒状的,因为它们允许科学家之间进行更精确的比较;包容性的,因为它们理解了几个流行的指数。我们的SRM的另一个关键特征是,它们计划根据特定的科学界进行校准。我们还提出了对这一问题的双重表述,并解释了它在这一背景下的相关性。
---
英文标题:
《From Risk Measures to Research Measures》
---
作者:
Marco Frittelli and Ilaria Peri
---
最新提交年份:
2012
---
分类信息:

一级分类:Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类:Risk Management        风险管理
分类描述:Measurement and management of financial risks in trading, banking, insurance, corporate and other applications
衡量和管理贸易、银行、保险、企业和其他应用中的金融风险
--

---
英文摘要:
  In order to evaluate the quality of the scientific research, we introduce a new family of scientific performance measures, called Scientific Research Measures (SRM). Our proposal originates from the more recent developments in the theory of risk measures and is an attempt to resolve the many problems of the existing bibliometric indices. The SRM that we introduce are based on the whole scientist's citation record and are: coherent, as they share the same structural properties; flexible to fit peculiarities of different areas and seniorities; granular, as they allow a more precise comparison between scientists, and inclusive, as they comprehend several popular indices. Another key feature of our SRM is that they are planned to be calibrated to the particular scientific community. We also propose a dual formulation of this problem and explain its relevance in this context.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1012
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群