全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 微观经济学
2184 3
2006-10-27

Suppose that people live for two periods, working L hours in the first period for which they receive a wage of w dollars per hour, and living in retirement in the the second period. As they do not work during the second period, they provide for their retirement by saving S dollars during the first period and lending it to producers. During their retirement, they receive and spend their entire savings as well as the interest earned at a rate of r% per period.

People consume only rice, and their tastes are represented by the utility function:

U=C1.C2

C1=consumption of rice in the first period

C2=consumption of rice in the second period

Derive the demand functions for rice in each period.

My answer: WL-S=P1C1

S+r%.S=P2C2

P1C1+P2C2=WL+S+r%.S

Using Langange function: P1C1=P2C2=(WL+r%.S)/2

I feel this must be wrong, since I've already have had WL-S=P1C1,S+r%.S=P2C2

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2006-10-27 12:23:00

(1) C1=W×L-S

(2) C2=(1+r)×S

通过(1)和(2)把 S 消掉,得到 Intertemporal Budge Constraint(IBC)。

然后选择 C1 和 C2 求 U=C1×C2 的极大值,subjected to IBC。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2006-10-27 13:19:00
把s消去答案就对了
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2006-10-27 22:13:00

Using Langange function: P1C1=P2C2=(WL+r%.S)/2

我是这样理解这个式子的,也就是说在这两个时期,他们的效用是相等的,但如上面三楼的兄弟说的那样,应该把"s"消掉,但是这样做就不考虑通货膨胀的因素了.

 

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群