以下是引用bajjio在2006-11-23 13:49:00的发言:
In Marx's articles,he always emphasize "value in use" In neoclassical economics and other kinds of economics except Marx's,"value in exchange"is firstly taken into account.as far as I am concerned,nobody can produce all the commodity he need to use.So only under exchange can they get the value in use,and I think the theory of labor 's value cannot tell us how to get information,but the "value in exchange"can tell us.Of course ,Marxist's theory is a kind of valuable theory,but it is only a kind of ways to think of the world ,nobody can criticize every theory through moral critique.And in the so-called western economics,value exists ,and after Marshall,the price equals value.And the relative price,I think it is also important in economic decision.
谢谢参与交流。
从资源配置的角度看,价格比价值要实用的多。马克思想提出一个理论来支持阶级斗争,因而其理论抽象色彩浓厚,西方经济学侧重资源配置,因而对价格格外推崇。