全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 真实世界经济学(含财经时事)
3837 20
2012-06-08
The US tax system needs rebuilding
by Lawrence Summers

The writer of the article is Charles W. Eliot university professor at Harvard University and a former US Treasury Secretary

The article was too long to be pasted here and also needed permission to paste to any websites, so I only provided the original article's link in the thread below.

original article's link: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/38274f48-5e4f-11e1-8c87-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1x7fhAaw9

I think everyone, who finds and posts great articles in this forum, should carefully read and comment the forwarded article, and then let others to comment your thread. Consequently, all of us could learn something from the article. Do not just post a forwarded article without your own comments for adding "hot and great (精华)" and earning experience points. The reason is that you would not learn anything from the article without carefully reading and analyzing the article.


I did not analyze the whole article again, but I analyzed three main points that the author mentioned about the current U.S. tax system and its ongoing reform.


The author's first main point was to stress that "the U.S. will need to mobilise more revenue" (Eilot, 2012). Back to Bush's Administration, the federal government cut taxes for the rich. Currently, Obama's Administration cuts taxes for the low-income family and the middle class in order to help them recover from the downturn economy as soon as possible. However, cutting tax is not good in the long run not only because cutting tax will hurt Americans' future generations' benefits. Another reason is caused by the rising cost of healthcare and the cost of healthcare reform, and other government spending projects. Healthcare reform is a big topic, so I would not further discuss it here. Nevertheless, all of government projects cannot be implemented without earning enough revenue, but that does not mean the government should rely on borrowing a lot of money from other countries. The reason is that Americans' future generations have to pay back the bill the current people owes that will increase their future economic burdens.  

Cutting non-urgent projects and rasing taxes on the rich taxpayers at the same time should be a solution to reform the current "unfair" tax system. In his second main point, the author explained more details about why we should raise taxes on the rich to reduce the income gap among different classes in the U.S. You can read his opinion in the original article, so I will not further discuss it here.

Moreover, the author's third point was to demonstrate U.S. tax code and marginal tax rates. Of course the rich has to pay higher marginal tax rates than the low-income households. However, the current upper limit marginal tax rates is below 50%. I haven't searched any data, so I cannot give you a detailed analysis here. But one thing is clear that the U.S. government should set tax breaks on low-income families and raise taxes on the rich to reduce the income gap between these two classes in the ongoing tax system reform.

By the way, I have analyzed the U.S. tax reform for Obama's Administration in 2010, but I don't have time to modify and share my paper with you here today. If I have time, I will do so later this summer or this fall.

I only took an hour to read and comment the article. If you find any mistakes I made in my comments, please point them out, and I will correct them later on. Now you guys are welcome to continue the discussion below.   









二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2012-6-8 00:59:11
Haha, I am the first user commented the thread below. Please read the main thread and my comment. The author did not follow the rules to post a forwarded article, so probably his thread did not draw much attention to other people.

https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1491645-1-1.html
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-6-8 10:56:15
受到警告
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-6-8 12:01:54
受到警告
我只想说  你的英文真好啊
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-6-8 13:59:10
Your comment is eyecatching, and your offering viewpoints in English(english) is encouraging for whomever(whoever) loves the forum.  I am sure you are enterprisng and meticulous.

By(by) the way, have you registered in FT? Can you read all the articles?


请注意:英语文章中段落之间要采用缩行式或者空行式,两者需要任意选择一种.
缩行式是指每段首字母缩进4个字符,段落之间不空行;
空行式是指每段首字母顶格写,段落之间要空一行.

如果既不缩行也不空行,整个文章浑然一体,就不太好了.


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2012-6-8 14:33:57
受到警告
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群