| name | year | vrs | FI | FG | FA | NPL | LTD |
| ZH | 2007 | 44.9 | 11.86 | 21.32 | 44.72 | 3.12 | 64 |
| ZH | 2008 | 39 | 11.76 | 19.94 | 42.04 | 2.65 | 61.3 |
| ZH | 2009 | 55.6 | 13.70 | 18.87 | 36.62 | 1.52 | 70.3 |
| ZH | 2010 | 50.1 | 14.41 | 6.12 | 55.69 | 1.1 | 71.72 |
| ZH | 2011 | 49.1 | 14.52 | 29.13 | 48.95 | 1 | 68.77 |
| GH | 2007 | 41.7 | 2.55 | 3.44 | 6.43 | 2.74 | 56.3 |
| GH | 2008 | 38.5 | 2.34 | 4.12 | 4.73 | 2.29 | 56.4 |
| GH | 2009 | 55.6 | 2.16 | 4.80 | 3.27 | 1.54 | 59.5 |
| GH | 2010 | 56.5 | 1.91 | 4.36 | 3.10 | 1.08 | 62 |
| GH | 2011 | 53.8 | 1.77 | 3.57 | 2.90 | 0.94 | 63.5 |
| JS | 2007 | 50.9 | 1.03 | 0.96 | 3.61 | 2.6 | 61.41 |
| JS | 2008 | 47 | 1.23 | 1.83 | 2.51 | 2.21 | 59.5 |
| JS | 2009 | 60.4 | 1.31 | 0.92 | 4.96 | 1.5 | 60.24 |
| JS | 2010 | 67.6 | 1.18 | 1.95 | 3.25 | 1.14 | 62.47 |
| JS | 2011 | 57.1 | 0.88 | 2.48 | 3.23 | 1.09 | 65.05 |
| JT | 2007 | 47 | 2.77 | 3.82 | 7.20 | 2.06 | 62.6 |
| JT | 2008 | 50.9 | 2.70 | 4.00 | 6.15 | 1.92 | 64.91 |
| JT | 2009 | 64 | 3.04 | 4.93 | 3.18 | 1.36 | 71.97 |
| JT | 2010 | 66.1 | 2.84 | -0.07 | 5.57 | 1.12 | 72.1 |
| JT | 2011 | 66.2 | 2.61 | 4.23 | 6.17 | 0.86 | 71.94 |
| ZX | 2007 | 53.2 | 2.37 | 0.77 | 4.89 | 1.48 | 62.86 |
| ZX | 2008 | 56.7 | 3.29 | 1.38 | 5.93 | 1.41 | 61.66 |
| ZX | 2009 | 66.7 | 5.16 | 4.52 | 6.03 | 0.95 | 79.62 |
| ZX | 2010 | 76.6 | 3.67 | -0.45 | 10.98 | 0.2 | 72.83 |
| ZX | 2011 | 79.5 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 72.97 |
| NH | 2007 | 32.2 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 1.30 | 23.57 | 65.71 |
| NH | 2008 | 25.3 | 0.36 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 4.32 | 50.84 |
| NH | 2009 | 50.6 | 0.30 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 2.91 | 55.19 |
| NH | 2010 | 45.5 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.58 | 2.03 | 55.77 |
| NH | 2011 | 48.2 | 0.29 | 2.43 | 0.70 | 1.55 | 58.5 |
变量分别是行名、年份、综合效率及其影响因素，想要用tobit分析效率的影响因素，stata一点基础也没有（都说tobit分析stata好做，eviews试了不行），看了半天也看不通，各位高手，不吝赐教啊
扫码加好友，拉您进群
全部版块
我的主页
收藏
