先顶一下

只找到同作者的另外一篇类似的
Mental health in adolescence: is America's youth flourishing?希望能帮到楼主

谢谢这位朋友~

楼主我只找到该篇文章的信息 但是没有pdf链接 我查找了几个数据库 均是类似的介绍 没有电子版文件
楼主可以给作者发邮件 声明是为了研究引用之用 相信作者会给您发过去的 作者邮件在下面的信息中

The Subjective Well-Being of America's Youth: Toward a Comprehensive Assessment.Authors:Keyes, Corey L. M., Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US, corey.keyes@emory.edu
Address:Keyes, Corey L. M., Emory University Room 225 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30322, corey.keyes@emory.edu
Source:Adolescent & Family Health, Vol 4(1), 2006. pp. 3-11.
Page Count:9
Publisher:US: Inst for Youth Development.
ISSN:1533-9890 (Print)
Language:English
Keywords:subjective well being, psychological well being, mental health
Abstract:Research on adults has yielded upwards of 13 facets of subjective well-being that reflect the dimensions of emotional, psychological, and social well-being. There is little or no research on whether the same dimensions characterize the well-being of youth, and the research that does exist on subjective well-being in young people focuses exclusively on hedonic (i.e., happiness or life satisfaction) well-being. This study used data from the second wave of the Child Development Supplement (CDS-II) of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), in which a comprehensive set of subjective well-being items were administered to youth ages 12 to 18. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the hypothesis that the three factor model of emotional, psychological, and social well-being provided the best fit to these data. Descriptive analyses revealed that the CDS-II youth experienced more emotional than psychological well-being, and more psychological than social well-being. Evidence also supported the construct validity of the well-being measures. The subjective well-being measures correlated relatively strongly with scales of global self concept, self-determination, and school integration, modestly with measures of depression, closeness to family and friends, and self-rated health, and weakly with measures of math and reading skill. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Subjects:*Adolescent Attitudes; *Adolescent Development; *Mental Health; *Well Being
Classification:Psychosocial & Personality Development (2840)
Population:Human (10)
Male (30)
Female (40)
Location:US
Age Group:Childhood (birth-12 yrs) (100)
School Age (6-12 yrs) (180)
Adolescence (13-17 yrs) (200)
Adulthood (18 yrs & older) (300)
Young Adulthood (18-29 yrs) (320)
Methodology:Empirical Study; Quantitative Study
Format Covered:Electronic
Publication Type:Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal
Document Type:Journal Article
Release Date:20070226
Accession Number:2006-12792-001
Number of Citations in Source:59
Database: PsycINFO

楼主我只找到该篇文章的信息 但是没有pdf链接 我查找了几个数据库 均是类似的介绍 没有电子版文件
楼主可以给作者发邮件 声明是为了研究引用之用 相信作者会给您发过去的 作者邮件在下面的信息中

The Subjective Well-Being of America's Youth: Toward a Comprehensive Assessment.Authors:Keyes, Corey L. M., Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US, corey.keyes@emory.edu
Address:Keyes, Corey L. M., Emory University Room 225 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30322, corey.keyes@emory.edu
Source:Adolescent & Family Health, Vol 4(1), 2006. pp. 3-11.
Page Count:9
Publisher:US: Inst for Youth Development.
ISSN:1533-9890 (Print)
Language:English
Keywords:subjective well being, psychological well being, mental health
Abstract:Research on adults has yielded upwards of 13 facets of subjective well-being that reflect the dimensions of emotional, psychological, and social well-being. There is little or no research on whether the same dimensions characterize the well-being of youth, and the research that does exist on subjective well-being in young people focuses exclusively on hedonic (i.e., happiness or life satisfaction) well-being. This study used data from the second wave of the Child Development Supplement (CDS-II) of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), in which a comprehensive set of subjective well-being items were administered to youth ages 12 to 18. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the hypothesis that the three factor model of emotional, psychological, and social well-being provided the best fit to these data. Descriptive analyses revealed that the CDS-II youth experienced more emotional than psychological well-being, and more psychological than social well-being. Evidence also supported the construct validity of the well-being measures. The subjective well-being measures correlated relatively strongly with scales of global self concept, self-determination, and school integration, modestly with measures of depression, closeness to family and friends, and self-rated health, and weakly with measures of math and reading skill. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Subjects:*Adolescent Attitudes; *Adolescent Development; *Mental Health; *Well Being
Classification:Psychosocial & Personality Development (2840)
Population:Human (10)
Male (30)
Female (40)
Location:US
Age Group:Childhood (birth-12 yrs) (100)
School Age (6-12 yrs) (180)
Adolescence (13-17 yrs) (200)
Adulthood (18 yrs & older) (300)
Young Adulthood (18-29 yrs) (320)
Methodology:Empirical Study; Quantitative Study
Format Covered:Electronic
Publication Type:Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal
Document Type:Journal Article
Release Date:20070226
Accession Number:2006-12792-001
Number of Citations in Source:59
Database: PsycINFO