全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 悬赏大厅 求助成功区
263 1
2013-01-29
悬赏 10 个论坛币 未解决
Lundblad, C. (2007). "The risk return tradeoff in the long run: 1836–2003." Journal of Financial Economics 85(1): 123-150.
    Previous studies typically find a statistically insignificant relation between the market risk premium and its expected volatility. Further, several of these studies estimate a negative risk return tradeoff, contrary to the predictions of mainstream theory. Using simulations, I demonstrate that even 100 years of data constitute a small sample that may easily lead to this finding even though the true risk return tradeoff is positive. Small-sample inference is plagued by the fact that conditional volatility has almost no explanatory power for realized returns. Using the nearly two century history of U.S. equity market returns from Schwert [1990. Indexes of United States stock prices from 1802 to 1987. Journal of Business 63, 399–426], I estimate a positive and statistically significant risk return tradeoff. Finally, exploratory analysis suggests a role for a time-varying relation linked to the changing nature of the U.S. economy.


【全文链接或数据库名称(选填)】

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X07000360
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2013-1-29 13:14:11
this one?
附件: 您需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?我要注册
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群