全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 产业经济学
2200 2
2007-12-04
<strong>关于最优所得税的几个问题(10金币)</strong><div style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 10px; ; OVERFLOW-X: hidden; WIDTH: 97%; WORD-BREAK: break-all; TEXT-INDENT: 24px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; HEIGHT: 200px; WORD-WRAP: break-word;"><p>这是经典最优所得税理论的一个总结:</p><div class="quote"><p>Optimal Income Taxes </p><p>On equity grounds, income taxes should be higher on those with greater income; indeed, under some special conditions, income taxes should be chosen to&nbsp;equalize after-tax incomes, thereby implying <strong>marginal tax rates of 100 percent</strong>. <u>However, on efficiency grounds, marginal tax rates should be lower the more responsive are individuals in their labor decisions, the smaller is the spread in the skills of the individuals, the less concerned with equality is society, and the lower is the amount of revenue that government must collect.</u> In fact, the <strong>marginal tax rate on the single richest individual should be zero.</strong></p></div><p>1、从公平的角度上讲边际税率要100%呢?</p><p>2、划线的一句话太长,把我绕晕了,什么意思?</p></div>

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-27 11:30:27编辑过]

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2007-12-4 15:12:00
你可以尝试在marginal tax rates should be lower后面加个逗号,理解起来就容易些了。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2007-12-5 23:57:00
<p>&nbsp;直译过来就是:</p><p>然而,从效率的角度来讲,边际税率应该更低。富人的劳动决策更容易受到影响,个人技术的传播面更窄,社会更少关注公平,政府应该筹集更少的税收。事实上,对富人的边际税率应该是0.</p><p>英语水平不好,错漏的地方请多见谅。</p>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群