全部版块 我的主页
论坛 数据科学与人工智能 数据分析与数据科学 SPSS论坛
2299 4
2014-05-22
A地区经济实力综合得分是6B地区经济实力综合得分是2
能不能说A地区经济实力是B地区的3倍?
附件列表
QQ图片20140522193511.jpg

原图尺寸 4.04 KB

QQ图片20140522193511.jpg

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2014-5-22 19:44:02
不能,比如用score=40*x+60方法算得分,所得分数只能表示高的比低的好
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-5-22 19:46:39
lyq617 发表于 2014-5-22 19:44
不能,比如用score=40*x+60方法算得分,所得分数只能表示高的比低的好
哦 好 谢谢啊
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-5-23 22:52:41
需要请联系QQ:1298997509
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2014-5-24 04:05:49
Intuitively, factors are latent variables that underly the scores in your observed variables. Usually, the interpretation of each of these factors is based on the content of the original variables so that each factor is interpreted as whatever the attributes with high loadings for this particular factor have in common. Ideally, factor scores would therefore represent the score of each person on the underlying latent variable.

By construction, regression factor scores in SPSS are standardized. A score of 0 on a factor therefore means that this person's ratings of the importance of the relevant attributes is close to the average for your sample. Similarly, a negative score means that the person gave lower than average importance ratings and vice versa (all this holds for variables with positive loadings, for negative loadings the relationship is inverted, i.e. positive factor scores would correspond to lower than average ratings).

Obviously, the sample average is not necessarily the middle of your scale. For example, if everybody considers the attributes related to one particular factor as important or very important, a factor score of 0 might correspond to an average rating of 4 on the original attributes.

Note that while this approach has been criticized, in psychology it is still common to compute “scales' scores” by simply adding or averaging the ratings on the original variables. Factor analysis is only used to select and refine the subset of the original variables that constitute each scale. One advantage of this approach is that these scores use the same metric than the original variables, so that a score around 4 or 5 could be interpreted as a high level of importance for the relevant attributes, etc. Perhaps you will find this type of scores easier to interpret.

I don't know if this fully answers your question but you might in any case find more relevant information in the following paper:

DiStefano, C., Zhu, M. & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Practical Assesment, Research & Evaluation, 14 (20). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v14n20.pdf
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群