全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 行为经济学与实验经济学
10450 10
2005-07-10

Acemoglu is an extremely broad and productive economist. He has made valuable contributions to several distinct fields, starting with labor economics, and successively moving to macroeconomics, institutional economics, and political economy. His most recent work on the role of institutions in development and in political economy is especially innovative, and has already had a large impact on research in these areas. Although Acemoglu is primarily a theorist, his work is always motivated by real-world questions that arise when facts are difficult to reconcile with existing theory.

We summarize Acemoglu’s work roughly in chronological order.

Labor Economics: Skill Acquisition and Technological Change

Acemoglu in a series of papers explored the question of whether there is underinvestment in general skills, and if so, why. As is typical in Acemoglu’s work, he began by looking carefully at existing models and understanding which assumptions driving the results might not be correct. Acemoglu in his 1997 REStud model departed from the standard assumption of perfect labor markets, and introduced costly search for unemployed workers. In variants of this model, Acemoglu and Pischke in their 1998 QJE and 1999 JPE papers include asymmetric information among employers about workers’ abilities and other distortions that also decrease worker mobility. His 1998 QJE model endogenizes technological change by letting firms choose technologies based on the skill distribution in the available pool of workers. This body of work introduces into labor economics a rich set of models that are more realistic than those they replace and has led to a large body of empirical work.

Macroeconomics: Investment and Growth

Jointly with Zilibotti (JPE 1997), Acemoglu develops the idea that a historical shock that results in a favorable increment to the capital stock may itself stimulate further investment and growth through a risk-diversifying, expected-return-enhancing mechanism.

Macroeconomics: Directed Search and Unemployment

Search models with frictions have long been used to examine employment and unemployment. These models typically can match some of the stylized facts of labor markets, but are wildly off in other dimensions. Acemoglu has developed an original labor market framework that is proving useful to labor economists, particularly those with a macro-orientation (Acemoglu and Shimer, JPE 1999 and REStud 2000). Equilibrium in even the simplest version of the model yields most of the relevant stylized facts. The feature of the model that accounts for its success is the idea of directed search: workers first learn something about different firms’ characteristics and then apply to a small subset of firms. Allowing this sort of directed search expands greatly the model’s ability to fit stylized facts. The model, along with subsequent variants, has led to a wide variety of empirical work.

The Role of Institutions in Economic Development and Political Economy

Acemoglu has several papers that argue that institutions play a more prominent role in development than was generally accepted. His 2002 QJE paper with Johnson and Robinson argues that countries that were relatively rich in 1500 are now relatively poor, a point that is inconsistent with the view that geography is destiny. The argument, supported by empirical evidence, is that this is due to colonizing countries treating rich and densely populated countries differently from poor and sparsely populated countries. In the former, they followed policies of extracting wealth and in the latter they followed policies that encouraged investment. Acemoglu’s 2001 AER paper, also with Johnson and Robinson, uses differences in mortality rates faced by Europeans in different countries to study further the degree to which different policies lead to different institutions, which in turn lead to different development paths. Some of the methods and the conclusions of this paper are still being debated, but this line of Acemoglu’s work has already stimulated substantial research that rethinks the development process. In related work on political economy, for example with Robinson in APSR 2001, he has examined the dynamics of political processes and the persistence of inefficient policies. This work has been influential in political science.

CV: http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_cv.php?prof_id=acemoglu

Personal web page: http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/?prof_id=acemoglu

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2005-7-10 19:54:00

Daron Acemoglu,这个MIT的教授非常特别,在微观经济学的首都不懈研究政治经济学,特别是把制度(政治制度)和收入分配、经济增长的关系发挥得凛凛精致。以前索洛称阿马迪亚.森是经济学的良心,其实阿希姆格鲁何尝不是?

可是这些良心经济学家往往被国内所谓主流经济学家划为激进经济学分子或者左派或者非经济学问题

我们是不是应该牢记胡适的话:少说点主义,多谈点问题

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-7-11 16:00:00
2楼评的好
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-7-28 22:49:00
以下是引用闲人在2005-7-10 19:54:09的发言:

Daron Acemoglu,这个MIT的教授非常特别,在微观经济学的首都不懈研究政治经济学,特别是把制度(政治制度)和收入分配、经济增长的关系发挥得凛凛精致。以前索洛称阿马迪亚.森是经济学的良心,其实阿希姆格鲁何尝不是?

可是这些良心经济学家往往被国内所谓主流经济学家划为激进经济学分子或者左派或者非经济学问题

我们是不是应该牢记胡适的话:少说点主义,多谈点问题

1) "可是这些良心经济学家往往被国内所谓主流经济学家划为激进经济学分子或者左派或者非经济学问题 "

___ 呵呵,对斑竹的这个说法很感兴趣! 想知道国内是谁抱有这种想法??

因为Acemoglu的所有研究领域——LABOR、Political Economy、ECONOMIC GROWTH等都是现代主流经济学的标准领域,这是常识。

2) “Daron Acemoglu,这个MIT的教授非常特别,在微观经济学的首都不懈研究政治经济学,。。。。。。”

——————————

Daron Acemoglu获克拉克奖几乎所有人意料之中的事情。Daron1967年出生,是土耳其人(顺便一提,现在在MIT、CHICAGO等顶级经济系的教师中,还有几位年轻的土尔其人),在英国接受的经济学训练,1992年获得LSE博士学位,在LSE担任一年讲师后,旋即转往MIT经济系任教,1993——1997年担任Assistant Professor of Economics,1997-2000担任 Pentti Kouri Associate Professor of Economics, 2000升任正教授,2004年起担任新设立的Charles P. Kindleberger Professor of Applied Economics———————— 这是Charles P. Kindleberger的学生——一位台湾商人(MIT经济系毕业生)为纪念Charles P. Kindleberger捐资设立的讲座教授席位。

另外,Daron Acemoglu在2004年 还获得University of Chicago 经济系新设立的T. W. Shultz Prize,颁奖主持人为ROBERT SHIMER————芝大经济系教授,JPE主编,Daron Acemoglu指导过的博士生,一位潜在的克拉克奖得主。

这些荣誉,可以都看作为Daron Acemoglu 2005年荣获克拉克奖的预演。Daron Acemoglu 的主要学术成就,AEA的介绍中已经比较清楚了,和SHLEIFER一样(同样二人对政治经济学皆有浓厚的兴趣),Acemoglu也是一位研究领域广泛的经济学家。 尤其是最近几年Acemoglu与其在LSE就读时的同学ROBINSON做了一项非常有影响的工作——————即长期经济发展与经济制度的实证研究,很多人认为这些工作是使Acemoglu今年获奖的重要原因之一。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-29 1:32:02编辑过]

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-7-29 10:21:00

不好点名呵。

总体来看,国内对Acemgolu的学术成果的关注远远小于Tirole等人,这就是路径依赖。因为回国的海龟中活跃的很多都迷恋产业组织

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2005-7-30 22:14:00
国内对于“新政治经济学”的名头还有望文生义的旧解,这阻碍了这门学科在中国的发展。不知算不算行为经济学的研究范畴啊,哈哈
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

点击查看更多内容…
相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群