最近在读一些关于patent的文章，整理了近十年来research policy的best papers，跟大家一起分享

[1].        de Saint-Georges, M. and B. van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, A quality index for patent systems. Research Policy, 2013. 42(3): p. 704-719.
[2].        Alcácer, J., M. Gittelman and B. Sampat, Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 2009. 38(2): p. 415-427.
[3].        Henrekson, M.和.G.B., Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research policy, 2003. 32(4): p. 639 - 658.
[4].        Harhoff, D., F.M. Scherer and K. Vopel, Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 2003. 32(8): p. 1343-1363.
[5].        van Zeebroeck, N., B. van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie and D. Guellec, Claiming more: the Increased Voluminosity of Patent Applications and its Determinants. Research Policy, 2009. 38(6): p. 1006-1020.
[6].        Svensson, R., Commercialization of patents and external financing during the R&D phase. Research Policy, 2007. 36(7): p. 1052-1069.
[7].        de Rassenfosse, G., Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions? Research Policy, 2013. 42(5): p. 1072-1079.
[8].        Helmers, C. and M. Rogers, Does patenting help high-tech start-ups? Research Policy, 2011. 40(7): p. 1016-1027.
[9].        Audretsch, D.B., W. Bönte and P. Mahagaonkar, Financial signaling by innovative nascent ventures: The relevance of patents and prototypes. Research Policy, 2012. 41(8): p. 1407-1421.
[10].        Reitzig, M., Improving patent valuations for management purposes—validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 2004. 33(6-7): p. 939-957.
[11].        Giuri, P., et al., Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, 2007. 36(8): p. 1107-1127.
[12].        Sanders, A.K., Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions. Research Policy, 2006. 35(6): p. 854-874.
[13].        Nelson, A.J., Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 2009. 38(6): p. 994-1005.
[14].        Burke, P.F. and M. Reitzig, Measuring patent assessment quality—Analyzing the degree and kind of (in)consistency in patent offices’ decision making. Research Policy, 2007. 36(9): p. 1404-1430.
[15].        Blind, K., et al., Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 2006. 35(5): p. 655-672.
[16].        Woolgar, L., New institutional policies for university–industry links in Japan. Research Policy, 2007. 36(8): p. 1261-1274.
[17].        Liegsalz, J. and S. Wagner, Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China. Research Policy, 2013. 42(2): p. 552-563.
[18].        Harhoff, D., et al., Patent validation at the country level—The role of fees and translation costs. Research Policy, 2009. 38(9): p. 1423-1437.
[19].        Mann, R.J. and T.W. Sager, Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups. Research Policy, 2007. 36(2): p. 193-208.
[20].        Penin, J., Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look. Research Policy, 2005. 34(5): p. 641-656.
[21].        Blind, K., K. Cremers and E. Mueller, The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy, 2009. 38(2): p. 428-436.
[22].        Picci, L., The internationalization of inventive activity: A gravity model using patent data. Research Policy, 2010. 39(8): p. 1070-1081.
[23].        Bessen, J., The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 2008. 37(5): p. 932-945.
[24].        de Rassenfosse, G., et al., The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 2013. 42(3): p. 720-737.
[25].        Dolfsma, W., Towards a dynamic (Schumpeterian) welfare economics. Research Policy, 2005. 34(1): p. 69-82.
[26].        Yang, C. and N. Kuo, Trade-related influences, foreign intellectual property rights and outbound international patenting. Research Policy, 2008. 37(3): p. 446-459.
[27].        Kani, M. and K. Motohashi, Understanding the technology market for patents: New insights from a licensing survey of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 2012. 41(1): p. 226-235.
[28].        Patel, D. and M.R. Ward, Using patent citation patterns to infer innovation market competition. Research Policy, 2011. 40(6): p. 886-894.
[29].        Reitzig, M., What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 2003. 32(1): p. 13-26.
[30].        Dahlin, K.B. and D.M. Behrens, When is an invention really radical? Research Policy, 2005. 34(5): p. 717-737.
[31].        Walsh, J.P., W.M. Cohen and C. Cho, Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy, 2007. 36(8): p. 1184-1203.