Question 3
It has been argued by some notable researchers that the extent of regulation relating to financial accounting and reporting is excessive and should be reduced, however, with the passage of time the amount of regulation has increased. Describe and explain the main arguments raised by these authors for reducing accounting regulation and the response to these arguments given by the proponents of regulation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't have official answer, simply try to be helpful.
a. Describe and explain the main arguments raised by these authors for reducing accounting regulation and
It is true that the accounting regulation is too much today.
Thousand of pages audit standards, hundred of reporting templates, not to mention numerous amendments.
The updating regulations consume huge attention of accounting professionals in form of training, testing and legal conflicts. Some of the legal items are so complex that even professionals couldn't understand clearly and appropriately, not to mention average investors.
In summary, the regulation won't improve investment efficiency but reduce its efficiency.
b. the response to these arguments given by the proponents of regulation.
Standing on the other side, policy makers worry more about social order. They prefer to build legal buildings one after another. They are good at it. However, it is not a good news for investors and accounting professionals who are to bear the burden of heavy learning and application.