来源:世界银行（ＷＢ）
页码：160
编译：可复制

目录
vii Abbreviations
ix Acknowledgments
xi Foreword
xiii Executive Summary
xxi Management Comments: Summary
xxiii Chairman’s Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE)
xxvii Evaluation Snapshot in Selected Languages
1 1 Introduction
5 PART I: TRACKING BANK PERFORMANCE
7 2 Development Outcomes: Indicators of Performance
9 Measuring Project Performance: Trends from IEG Monitoring
12 Project Outcomes in Fiscal 2007 Data
14 How It Adds Up: Outcomes of Bank Country Programs
19 3 Underpinning Impact—M&E and Results Management
21 Monitoring and Evaluation Systems at the Project Level
24 Country-Level M&E: Early Evidence from Results-Based CASs
26 Managing Global Programs and Partnerships: An Emerging Agenda
28 Improving Our Understanding of Causality: The Use of Impact Evaluations
30 Monitoring Institutional Effectiveness
33 4 Lessons and Opportunities
35 Practical Lessons for the Near Term
35 Directions for the Overall Bank Agenda
37 PART II: SHARED GLOBAL CHALLENGES—LESSONS FROM THE BANK’S EXPERIENCE
39 5 The Challenge of Global Public Goods
43 6 Using the Bank’s Country-Based Model to Foster Global Public Goods:
Does It Work?
45 How It Works in Theory—the Bank’s Strategic Setting for Fostering Global
Public Goods
49 Country Programs in Practice—from Strategy to Action
57 7 The Bank’s Advocacy on Global Public Goods: What Has Worked and
What Has Not?
59 The Dimensions of Advocacy
59 Advocacy at Its Best: The Bank’s Experience with Trade
60 The Complex Challenge of Environmental Commons and Climate Change
63 Creating a Unified Response: Learning from Avian Flu
Contents
65 Effective Advocacy Benefits from Voice and Representation
68 New Dimensions of Advocacy: Innovation through Financial Capabilities
71 8 Improving the Bank’s Support for Global Public Goods: Lessons from
Experience
75 Appendixes
77 A: Project Performance Results
91 B: Monitoring and Evaluation Overview
95 C: IEG’s Self-Evaluation: Improving Effectiveness
107 D: Features of Global Public Goods
111 E: Management Comments
119 Endnotes
123 Bibliography
Boxes
10 2.1 What Does a Satisfactory Project Look Like? Illustrations of
Development Impact
16 2.2 What Does a Satisfactory Country Program Look Like?
23 3.1 M&E Findings and Recommendations in Recent IEG Evaluations
24 3.2 Armenia Joint Country Portfolio Performance Review
26 3.3 Results Measurement and Monitoring in LICUS
27 3.4 Use of CAS Results Frameworks in Country Program Management
41 5.1 Key Characteristics of Global Public Goods
47 6.1 Brazil: A Best Practice in Integrating GPG Themes in Country
Strategies
48 6.2 Emerging Good Practice from the Regions
53 6.3 Bank GPG and MIC Strategies: Fates Entwined
61 7.1 Advocacy for Carbon Finance: The Bank’s Role in the Growth of a
World Market
62 7.2 Clean and Dirty Energy—Can the Bank Do Both?
65 7.3 Importance of Collaboration on Advocacy: HIV/AIDS
67 7.4 Governance as Institutional Experimentation: GEF
67 7.5 From Shareholder to Stakeholder Model: CGIAR
Figures
9 2.1 Project Performance Has Improved over the Medium Term
11 2.2 Trends in Sectoral Performance
12 2.3 Africa’s Projects Have Improved Substantially but Still Lag Behind
Other Regions
15 2.4 CAEs Show Three-Fifths with Outcomes Moderately Satisfactory
or Better
17 2.5 CASCR Reviews Indicate That Bank Programs in MICs Outperform
Those in LICs
22 3.1 Projects with Higher Outcome Ratings Have Better M&E Ratings
22 3.2 M&E Is Rated Modest or Lower in Two-Thirds of ICR Reviews
29 3.3 About 70 Percent of Ongoing Evaluations Are Clustered in Five Areas
29 3.4 Nearly Two-Thirds of Ongoing Evaluations Are Located in
Two Regions
49 6.1 Bank Expenditures on Main GPG Themes
50 6.2 IBRD and IDA Lending for Main GPG Themes
i v
ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS 2008
55 6.3 Most Global Programs Do Not Focus on GPGs, but Most of the
Bank’s GPP Resources Are Devoted to Those That Do
66 7.1 Less Than Half of Funds Committed to Integrated Country Plans
Have Been Disbursed
Tables
11 2.1 Distribution of Project Ratings Moved Up the Scale in FY03–07
13 2.2 Disconnect between the Bank’s Self-Ratings and IEG Ratings
Increased Dramatically in FY07
15 2.3 Summary of CAE Ratings, FY98–08
17 2.4 Summary of CASCR Review Ratings, FY03–08