政治顺利就经济正常，政治混乱政坛不稳定总有总理或内阁辞职经济一定不佳的说法不一定成立，应当收集不同区域国家的经济发展信息，正向论证——国家重要领导管理层变动，政局混乱时候经济的发展情况同政局不混乱的时候对比；反向论证——近五年时间经济发展不好的国家，政局是否处于动荡中。根据对比分析的结果，进一步深层次思考原因，然后总结归纳一般的政治和经济发展作用规律

政治当然决定经济！！！
比如委内瑞拉总统马杜罗在2013年4月上台时，黑市上1美元能兑换24玻利瓦尔，
上周二1美元还能兑换1.1280万玻利瓦尔，周三就变成了1：1.41万。

概念要准确，若政治变动合乎法律程序，如日本首相内阁经常变动，经济稳定；否则，政变，破坏既定程序，如叙利亚政治混乱，经济也就不稳定，

An obvious instance of short-termism in governance leading to detriment to the economy is the US.  Witness how Trump's immediate moves after his election were to pull out of the TPP, and attempt a repeal of ObamaCare.

In my opinion, such flip flopping is VERY disruptive; for investors and businesses, the uncertainty can be a big turn-off. America's economy is large and diversified enough however, that economic growth will not be entirely derailed by such political and regulatory instability.

However, for countries with smaller and more vulnerable economies, such short termism can be very destructive.  

A positive example is China, where the stability of the Communist Party has allowed it to implement long term economics and social policies.  

Another would be Germany, where Angela Merkel and the Christian Democrats' rule have allowed them to employ a consistent line of policy.

政治顺利就经济正常，政治混乱政坛不稳定总有总理或内阁辞职经济一定不佳的说法不成立。首先要看政治体制；二是看政治是否成熟。比如日本，经常换总理，对经济影响也不是那么大。