全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学论坛 三区 博弈论
2393 4
2009-11-26
A seller is deciding upon which auction mechanism to use to sell her house.
The house is worth nothing to her if it is not sold. There are N potential
buyers who are each equally likely to value the house at anything between
0 and $99,000. Assume the bidders are risk-neutral and there is no such
thing as a reserve price!
What two factors do the bidders have to balance in deciding the optimal bid in a Dutch or first-price auction? If the bidders are using
equilibrium strategies then use the lecture notes to determine how long a bidder with valuation u should wait before stopping the clock if the
seller decides to use a Dutch auction?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2009-12-16 02:07:27
阿阿阿阿阿...
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-5-4 14:21:55
回头看看这个题目。。还是没人会做啊?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-5-8 03:36:55
daishuai01 发表于 2009-11-26 05:32
A seller is deciding upon which auction mechanism to use to sell her house.
The house is worth nothing to her if it is not sold. There are N potential
buyers who are each equally likely to value the house at anything between
0 and $99,000. Assume the bidders are risk-neutral and there is no such
thing as a reserve price!
What two factors do the bidders have to balance in deciding the optimal bid in a Dutch or first-price auction? If the bidders are using
equilibrium strategies then use the lecture notes to determine how long a bidder with valuation u should wait before stopping the clock if the
seller decides to use a Dutch auction?
the question only assumes symmetry of value distribution. What about independence? Is it private value? If yes, Dutch is strategically equivalent to FPA and each bidder is only willing to bid up to something smaller than their true value.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-5-8 07:55:59
顶楼上的。。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群