全部版块 我的主页
论坛 提问 悬赏 求职 新闻 读书 功能一区 经管百科 爱问频道
1708 2
2009-12-20
While controlling everything else (such as research questions, quality and quantity),

1. Which one of the two methodologies is more "powerful?"

2. Which one is more "meaningful?"

3. Which has a greater impact?

4. Which is more in need in the job market? (Specify the location please.)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2009-12-20 17:36:26
DO not think any questions like these, just think whether you like it and want to spend some time to do it
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2009-12-21 12:33:51
I agree. But "whether you like it and want to spend some time to do it" applies more to the research question that you seek, not the methodology you use. In this academic world of co-creating peer-review process, it is critical to learn the purpose and the potential impact of each possible approach, especially when you have an option.

  In addition, it may worth to explore which skill lead a Ph.D. student to a better job offer, while all the other factors are controlled. I am concerned about the math modeling in management science. Any one can enlighten me of its potential significance that differs from economic models?

  Many thanks.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群