(1)Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation
Ecological Economics
Volume 57, Issue 4, 1 June 2006, Pages 583-594

URL:doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021

(2)Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity

[url=][/url] [url=][/url]

Economics Letters
Volume 41, Issue 2, 1993, Pages 215-220
URL:doi:10.1016/0165-1765(93)90200-V

(3)An Independent Sample Test of Yea-Saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume 29, Issue 1, July 1995, Pages 121-132
URL:doi:10.1006/jeem.1995.1035 |

(4)Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity

[url=][/url] [url=][/url]

Journal of Forest Economics
Volume 15, Issues 1-2, January 2009, Pages 59-78
Valuing Environmental Goods and Services Derived from the Forests
URL:doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.008

(5)The citizen versus consumer distinction: An exploration of individuals' preferences in Contingent Valuation studies

Ecological Economics
Article in Press, Corrected Proof - Note to users
URL:doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.012 |

(6)Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope

[url=][/url] [url=][/url]

Ecological Economics
Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2001, Pages 133-148
URL"doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00210-X

(7)Economic valuation of coastal water quality and protest responses: A case study in Mitilini, Greece
Journal of Socio-Economics
Volume 37, Issue 6, December 2008, Pages 2478-2491
Special Issue: Cooperatives and the Economy

URL":doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.06.002