看到您这句话我真高兴，嘿嘿，因为我发放的调查问卷采用的5分制，所以累计方差贡献率很难提上去。

不同的学科有不同的标准，没有一个统一的标准：
Cumulative percentage of variance (criterion) is another area of disagreement in the factor
analysis approach, particularly in different disciplines, for example, the natural sciences,
psychology, and the humanities.5 No fixed threshold exists, although certain percentages
have been suggested. According to Hair et al.9in the natural sciences, factors should be
stopped when at least 95% of the variance is explained. In the humanities, the explained
variance is commonly as low as 50-60%.1,9
其中的1、5、9是文献，如下：
1. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. California: Sage Publications Inc; 2003.

5. Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006;66(3)

9. Hair J, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1995.

将数据随机选取部分进行再分析看如何
如果不行的话，根据因子载荷矩阵，剔除部分在因子载荷上低于0.5的题项，然后再重做因子分析看效果
如果都不行了，要么是重新收集数据，要么就要重新设计问卷了

将数据随机选取部分进行再分析看如何
如果不行的话，根据因子载荷矩阵，剔除部分在因子载荷上低于0.5的题项，然后再重做因子分析看效果
如果都不行了，要么是重新收集数据，要么就要重新设计问卷了

将数据随机选取部分进行再分析看如何
如果不行的话，根据因子载荷矩阵，剔除部分在因子载荷上低于0.5的题项，然后再重做因子分析看效果
如果都不行了，要么是重新收集数据，要么就要重新设计问卷了

社科类能够达到60%结果就是比较可靠的，50%以上也可以接受。