全部版块 我的主页
论坛 计量经济学与统计论坛 五区 计量经济学与统计软件
2522 4
2006-05-02

To zhaosweden:

How to test the serial correlation of residuals? That is : how to test that the standardized residuals are uncorrelated? Do we use Q statistics? If so, how to determine the conventional level?

How to test GARCH effects? That is : HOW TO TEST that squared residuals are uncorrelated? Do we use t-test for individual parameters and F-test for the null hypo that the cofficient on all laged values are jointly equal to zero? It is enough or we also need Q statistics? If so, how to determine the conventional level?

Also, how to test the leverage effects? Do we firstly use t-test for individual parameters, then use F-test for the null hypo that the cofficient on all laged values are jointly equal to zero, then use Engle-Ng sigh bias test?

I hope your answer. Mnay thanks in advance.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2006-5-3 02:30:00

How to test the serial correlation of residuals?: Q; Ljung-box test.

How to test GARCH effects?:(1) You can also use the same test statistic but with the squared returns, say. But note that this is a portmateau test, which means that it doesnot have a specific H1(alternative hypothesis). So it may not have ideal power. original form is chi-square, better to use F-form to expect a improved small sample property. (the Lm test of N*R^2 form, or F form)

How to test GARCH effects? (2) Engle's ARCH effect test works for ARCH and GARCH models. Wooldridge (regression-based) has a robust version of this test (robust against to heterscedasticity?). there is also some other technoques (some Austrian guy): robust against the distribution based on probability integral/inverse transform.

test the leverage effects?: Engle and Ng 1993 J of Finance, yes.

I am sorry for that I can not go into the detail since it take me a lot of time and this is BBS where everything is provided for free.

What I also want to say is that BBS is is not a good place to learn econometrics, it is always the textbooks or journal articles.

Furthermore I can not understand "conventional level", significance level? confidence level?

Good luck

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2006-5-3 09:28:00
强悍!英语都这么好啊!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2006-5-3 12:14:00

Thanks zhao.

Thanks zhao. You can say "go to ...textbook and .....journal paper to find your answer".
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2006-5-3 19:51:00

You can say "go to ...textbook and .....journal paper to find your answer".

======================

As a matter of fact, this is correct. My supervisor always tell : you can see ### 1999 paper to have the answer. Nothing wrong with this. When I told him that there is something wrong my GAUSS code, he says: check it again.

======================

I think it is perfect right to have such answers. The point is he/she tells you which paper which textbook you should read at the first place.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群