全部版块 我的主页
论坛 新商科论坛 四区(原工商管理论坛) MBA专版
3741 2
2010-08-30
Business and Management

Transnational Management: Text, Cases and Readings in Cross-Border Management28 February 2008
Arthur Francis

Enterprise with a strategic edge

If students read all the overview chapters and all the readings of this textbook, they should convince examiners that they demonstrate mastery of the subject matter and have read widely around the subject. It includes brief (12 to 15-page) overviews of eight key topics, each being accompanied by three to four case studies and two to three readings. This is the fifth edition, but more than half the case studies and half the readings are new to this edition. It seems an excellent model for many other management texts.
The text tells a good story. There is a particularly good institutional analysis of the different development paths, in different epochs, of multinationals from Europe, the US and Japan. A central thread running through the book is the persuasive argument that multinationals now need new generic strategies and structures. Compared with three other enterprise types the authors set up - the multinational, the international and the global - the transnational enterprise has to develop simultaneously global efficiency, national responsiveness, and worldwide learning capability and innovation. It has to configure its assets and capabilities so that they are dispersed throughout the worldwide enterprise but are interdependent and specialised. And it has to develop a new form of organisation that "is characterized by its legitimisation of multidimensional perspectives, its distributed and interdependent capabilities, and its flexible integrative processes".
Readers who find this prescription a little opaque will want to know that the authors dismiss the formal matrix organisation, the previously favoured solution to this challenge, as too complex.
For students needing to know how to manage large enterprises operating in a global environment, this text provides many helpful lessons. But it raises, for outsiders such as me, questions about the claims the international business community makes for its subject area. The authors insist that the topic of their study is only enterprises that "have substantial, direct investment in foreign countries and actively manage and regard those operations as integral parts of the company". And yet I, as dean of a business school with lots of "foreign' partners but no direct investments in them, found much of value to my own management thinking in this book. Moreover, many of the arguments in this text apply to management decisions to engage in operations in new territories where their "foreignness" is not at issue. The implicit insularity of this perspective becomes more obvious in those US and UK international business texts that talk about "overseas" operations. Another fundamental puzzle with this emphasis on national boundaries is that we now know quite a lot about the importance of place for an enterprise's strategy, but the important features of location are less to do with its nationality than with the institutional and other factors that Michael Porter has popularised in his diamond model.

There is also the question of what is not in the text. For me, a weakness is the way in which strategy is dealt with. Although there are some readings by Porter and by others espousing the resource-based approach to strategy, the official line in the text is Dunning's eclectic model, and there are only footnotes to Coase, Chandler or Williamson. I fear that some international business students could graduate from this course thinking that they don't need another course on general strategic management, don't need to know about transactions costs and market failure, and that the eclectic model is an adequate explanation for the geographical expansion of firms, whether by vertical or horizontal integration, or diversification, organically or by acquisition.
Who is it for? Undergraduate and masters students doing modules on international business.
Presentation: Excellent.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2010-8-30 17:46:45
This is one of the most difficult classes I had in university, and the following are the final exam questions and my answers.

1.Bartlett, Ghoshal, and Beamish seem to suggest in the textbook that transnational mentality is the ultimate and optimal status that multinational enterprie should aim to move forward. Why do they mae such contention and what do you think about it?

A:
近20年來,許多國際企業在全球市場上獲得許多勝利,其中包括international與 multinational的公司。然而,它們的勝利卻使本土化、當地化的力量出現且逐漸強勢,以反抗這股全球化的力量。

對許多當地政府來說,這些全球公司的power似乎越來越強,且威脅到本土的公司,本土公司也沒有足夠的能力去和這些全球的大公司競爭。於是當地政府為了保護本土公司,提高了法規的限制,例如要求這些跨國企業在當地投資,將技術轉移,或是當地政府的任何要求。另一方面,顧客對於這股當地化的力量也做出了貢獻,像是拒絕購買全球同質性的商品,或是偏好國貨,就算這些跨國公司提供的產品是高品質且價格低廉,也無法打動顧客的心。

最後,因為國際經濟與政治環境的變化,特別是匯率的變動,使得這些跨國企業集中生產產品的效率逐漸受到侵蝕。

然而許多跨國公司卻發現一件事,要回應當地市場和政治的需求與追求全球集中生產的效率卻是相衝突且背道而馳的。

在這樣的狀況下,multinational的公司追求當地化卻沒有全球生產的效率,global的公司則是剛好相反,然而現在跨國公司則是要同時兼顧當地化與追求全球生產的效率,因此multinational與global的mentality已經不再適合。

所以本書的作者大力提倡第四種mentality,也就是transnational。Transnational的mentality與centralized和decentralized的不同點在於,centralized是將主要營運活動與資源放在母國,decentralized是子公司針對當地環境而自行調整營運,而transnational則是將營運活動與資源專業化的散佈,同時追求效率與彈性,且在全球營運上是建立起整合與相互依賴的網絡。

和global比較,transnational有兼顧到彈性與當地化的營運;和multinational比較,transnational也提供整合性的營運,保留著競爭、經濟、生產效率。

所以,在現今國際經營環境的快速變化下,要能保有彈性、回應當地化,又要追求全球的效率,唯有transnational的mentality,這也是作者為何要在教科書上一再強調,跨國企業未來要繼續在全球市場上能繼續營運,transnational mentality或許是必要的。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2011-4-21 14:31:52
在哪可以下载?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群