全部版块 我的主页
论坛 金融投资论坛 六区 金融学(理论版)
4412 2
2010-09-04
请各位大虾帮我分析一下,文献“investor sentiment and the Cross-section of stock returns”中,出现了这样一段话" Because a mispricing is the result of an uninformed demand shock in the presence of a binding arbitrage constraint, we predict that a broad-based wave of sentiment has cross-sectional effects (that is, does not simply raise or lower all prices equally) when sentiment-based demands or arbitrage constraints vary across stocks. In practice, these two distinct channels lead to quite similar predictions because stocks that are likely to be most sensitive to speculative demand, those with highly subjective valuations, also tend to be the riskiest and costliest to arbitrage. Concretely, then, theory suggests two distinct channels through which the shares of certain firms—newer, smaller, more volatile, unprofitable, non-dividend paying, distressed or with extreme growth potential, and firms with analogouus characteristics—are likely to be more affected by shifts in investor sentiment.”
我实在不太明白。为什么套利会受到约束,什么情况下套利会“最有风险和最昂贵”?如果说是因为一些股票的定价受主观判断的影响而难以确定真实的价格,所以会出现难以套利的情况,那么套利和情绪不就是一个东西了吗?文中后面得出的关于情绪影响报酬的结论,并没有排除难以套利而影响报酬的因素阿。实在不明白,求解。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2010-9-4 11:14:37
There are many reasons for arbitrage constraints. For example, wide bid-ask spreads may make certain strategies difficult to execute.

Anyway, the article is obviously crap. I would not waste time on it.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

2010-9-6 06:56:57
请参考行为金融书籍中的相关论述
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群