摘要翻译：
移动是生命的基础，塑造了种群动态、生物多样性模式和生态系统结构。最近跟踪技术的进步使得关于运动的基本问题得以解决，导致运动生态学框架(MEF)的发展，被认为是该领域的一个里程碑[1]。MEF引入了机体运动的综合理论，将内部状态、运动能力和航行能力与外部因素联系起来。在这里，十年后，我们调查了该领域的研究现状。通过对超过8000篇运动生态学同行评议论文的文本挖掘方法，我们探索了主要的研究主题，评估了MEF的影响，并评估了技术设备、软件和统计方法的使用变化。在过去的十年里，出版物的数量有了很大的增加，技术也有了重大的变化（即GPS设备、加速度计和摄像机的使用增加，并向R靠拢），但我们发现研究集中在相同的问题上，特别是环境因素对运动和行为的影响。在实践中，运动生态学研究似乎没有反映MEF。我们呼吁研究人员将这一领域从技术驱动转向跨学科合作，以揭示运动（如导航）背后的关键过程，以及特定策略的进化、生理和生活史后果。
---
英文标题：
《A decade of movement ecology》
---
作者：
Roc\'io Joo, Simona Picardi, Matthew E. Boone, Thomas A. Clay,
  Samantha C. Patrick, Vilma S. Romero-Romero and Mathieu Basille
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Quantitative Biology        数量生物学
二级分类：Populations and Evolution        种群与进化
分类描述：Population dynamics, spatio-temporal and epidemiological models, dynamic speciation, co-evolution, biodiversity, foodwebs, aging; molecular evolution and phylogeny; directed evolution; origin of life
种群动力学；时空和流行病学模型；动态物种形成；协同进化；生物多样性；食物网；老龄化；分子进化和系统发育；定向进化；生命起源
--
一级分类：Quantitative Biology        数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology        其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--

---
英文摘要：
  Movement is fundamental to life, shaping population dynamics, biodiversity patterns, and ecosystem structure. Recent advances in tracking technology have enabled fundamental questions about movement to be tackled, leading to the development of the movement ecology framework (MEF), considered a milestone in the field [1]. The MEF introduced an integrative theory of organismal movement, linking internal state, motion capacity and navigation capacity to external factors. Here, a decade later, we investigated the current state of research in the field. Using a text mining approach on >8000 peer-reviewed papers in movement ecology, we explored the main research topics, evaluated the impact of the MEF, and assessed changes in the use of technological devices, software and statistical methods. The number of publications has increased considerably and there have been major technological changes in the past decade (i.e.~increased use of GPS devices, accelerometers and video cameras, and a convergence towards R), yet we found that research focuses on the same questions, specifically, on the effect of environmental factors on movement and behavior. In practice, it appears that movement ecology research does not reflect the MEF. We call on researchers to transform the field from technology-driven to embrace interdisciplinary collaboration, in order to reveal key processes underlying movement (e.g.~navigation), as well as evolutionary, physiological and life-history consequences of particular strategies.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.00110