全部版块 我的主页
论坛 经济学人 二区 外文文献专区
403 1
2022-03-22
摘要翻译:
我们分析了一个有两名选手的连续飞镖比赛,其中一名选手享有技术优势。使用因果机器学习文献中的方法,我们分析了先行者的内在优势,即潜在的更多但绝不会更少的移动。我们的实证结果表明,技术优势导致的先发者获胜的概率高出8.6个百分点。业绩衡量标准低、经验少的参赛者具有最高的内置优势。关于公平原则,即能力相同的参赛者应具有相同的获胜概率,在两个参赛者具有相同的内在优势和随机首发权的情况下,本次比赛是事前公平的。然而,比赛的设计为同样熟练的参赛者带来了不平等的获胜概率,因为与主客场比赛的参赛者的社会压力相关的内在优势不对称。
---
英文标题:
《Analysing a built-in advantage in asymmetric darts contests using causal
  machine learning》
---
作者:
Daniel Goller
---
最新提交年份:
2020
---
分类信息:

一级分类:Economics        经济学
二级分类:Econometrics        计量经济学
分类描述:Econometric Theory, Micro-Econometrics, Macro-Econometrics, Empirical Content of Economic Relations discovered via New Methods, Methodological Aspects of the Application of Statistical Inference to Economic Data.
计量经济学理论,微观计量经济学,宏观计量经济学,通过新方法发现的经济关系的实证内容,统计推论应用于经济数据的方法论方面。
--

---
英文摘要:
  We analyse a sequential contest with two players in darts where one of the contestants enjoys a technical advantage. Using methods from the causal machine learning literature, we analyse the built-in advantage, which is the first-mover having potentially more but never less moves. Our empirical findings suggest that the first-mover has an 8.6 percentage points higher probability to win the match induced by the technical advantage. Contestants with low performance measures and little experience have the highest built-in advantage. With regard to the fairness principle that contestants with equal abilities should have equal winning probabilities, this contest is ex-ante fair in the case of equal built-in advantages for both competitors and a randomized starting right. Nevertheless, the contest design produces unequal probabilities of winning for equally skilled contestants because of asymmetries in the built-in advantage associated with social pressure for contestants competing at home and away.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.07165
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

全部回复
2022-3-22 12:07:50
谢谢分享
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

相关推荐
栏目导航
热门文章
推荐文章

说点什么

分享

扫码加好友,拉您进群
各岗位、行业、专业交流群