摘要翻译：
保罗·A·萨缪尔森（1966）在所谓的剑桥关于资本理论技术重新转换的争论中投降，不仅具有指向生产和分配边际理论假定的内在矛盾的意义，而且具有维护学术和政治世界既得利益的意义。本文根据一个新的非切换定理，从生产经济理论的角度论证了萨缪尔森投降的逻辑依据。
---
英文标题：
《Refuting Samuelson's Capitulation on the Re-switching of Techniques in
  the Cambridge Capital Controversy》
---
作者：
Carlo Milana
---
最新提交年份：
2019
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：Theoretical Economics        理论经济学
分类描述：Includes theoretical contributions to Contract Theory, Decision Theory, Game Theory, General Equilibrium, Growth, Learning and Evolution, Macroeconomics, Market and Mechanism Design, and Social Choice.
包括对契约理论、决策理论、博弈论、一般均衡、增长、学习与进化、宏观经济学、市场与机制设计、社会选择的理论贡献。
--

---
英文摘要：
  Paul A. Samuelson's (1966) capitulation during the so-called Cambridge controversy on the re-switching of techniques in capital theory had implications not only in pointing at supposed internal contradiction of the marginal theory of production and distribution, but also in preserving vested interests in the academic and political world. Based on a new non-switching theorem, the present paper demonstrates that Samuelson's capitulation was logically groundless from the point of view of the economic theory of production.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.01250